Lightning isn’t Bitcoin! 😅
Prove me wrong 👀
Discussion
It is definitely layered bitcoin,
Yes you are wrong
That answer doesn’t prove nothing 😅
Ok, then kindly send me a lightning transaction (zap) which isn’t sats or bitcoin. Send me your fake sats through lightning.
It’s you that needs to prove your statement that lightning isn’t bitcoin
Quit making people think, it's early in the morning, lol.
Ahaha, here is 3PM, sorry mate 🤣🤣
A little thinking never killed nobody 😉😎
Aight J Cole she’s knows
Is lightning just an IOU, backed by a Bitcoin retainer, until settled on-chain?
This is the question. I thought of it like a beer tab... but is it more like those beer tickets you buy when you go to Oktoberfest. Please clarify, and use beer in your example
My UTXOs say you’re wrong.
Send me any Lightning you have
According to Eric Voskuil, lightning is credit
Literally what you just noteid👇
A two party 2 of 2 multisig isn't Bitcoin
Prove me wrong👀
The channel funding output itself is Bitcoin, but unconfirmed updates to channel state can be considered credit.
Ahh, but it's not because I have a fully signed commitment by both parties that I can broadcast at any time. That ser, is not credit. No permission is required. It may not be what some consider a trad utxo but credit is absolutely NOT the right word as no one owes anyone anything. Both parties have equal sovereignty in the relationship.