Just in case you are 24 years late:
Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.
🫡
Discussion
with Oxygen jet fuel can burn significantly hotter than the melting point of steel.
but you don't need to melt them. Steel beams lose much of their strength at temperatures significantly below their melting point.
Trazyn, a third building disappeared in a matter of seconds and no planes hit it. You need demolition experts to make a building vanish like that. It's common sense
I'm commenting on the false narrative about steel not being effected by high temps. 1) jet fuel can melt steel and 2) steel doesn't need to melt to lose strength.
I'm not going to dive into any more US centric retarded conspiracy theories. I for one value my time and I'm not a retard.
Conspiracy = History. It's full of intrigue and mystery because humans are crafty and devious creatures that spend their entire lives lying to themselves and others.
How hot did the core columns need to collapse into their own footprint at freefall speed
At ~500C or ~930F steel has lost 40% of it's strength.
it goes down rapidly after that.
this is easily in the range of jet fuel under non ideal burning situations and if you introduce the right oxygen fuel mix it can cause temps of 2000C.
What speed does an aluminum plane need to be traveling to slice through steel?
oh so you're just going to ignore your first point i critiqued ?
is this what you do ? try and win on one point and move on when someone challenges you ?
You DO need to melt them if you want them to explain molten steel observed by the firefighters in the rubble over the next several weeks
Right On 🤓
Jet fuel > steel? Nah. 🫡
Global psyop, lives sacrified by elite criminals.
My favourite conspiracy theory ☺️
Imagine having this conversation in 2025.
Easy to spot the feds tarning as Bitcoin maximslists, though.
Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams, but it sure covers up an inside job
No planes hit the towers
So true
