“History is one long laundry list of how you can’t kill ideas with brute force.

What you can do is introduce better ideas.”

I've been thinking about this statement by HRF's nostr:nprofile1qqs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kueg6g89xw for a few weeks. Notably, HRF as an organization is strictly "non-violent" – they're only willing to support diplomatic and educational efforts to stop tyranny. If you're using force, they want nothing to do with you.

This week Russian finally took full control of the Shevchenko Lithium Ore Field in Ukraine. Yet another in a long list of minerals resources they've stolen.

That one ore deposit is estimated to have $141 billion dollars worth of lithium in it: https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/ukraine-s-lithium-wealth-diminishes-as-key-deposits-fall-to The total value of land and resources Russia has stolen is in the trillions of dollars.

Now ask yourself, is invading Ukraine a good idea for Russian? Can you convince Russians a better idea would be not invading Ukraine?

You're not going to do it by appealing to their rational self interest: stealing trillions of dollars is incredibly profitable. You're not going to do it by appealing to their humanity: they're a nation of monsters who have no qualms murdering Ukrainians in their sleep.

What you can do is change the incentives. At the moment, Russia has stolen something like $10 trillion worth of Ukrainian resources, at a cost of about 1 million casualties. That's $10 million of loot per casualty. That's a good deal, and it's precisely why they can pay soldiers enough to convince them to volunteer. If Russian gets a ceasefire now, they've profited enormously from their invasion.

Taking that property back and killing a lot more Russians will make that a much worse deal. That's exactly what needs to happen.

As for HRF, they're no different than the "defund the police" activists who tried to get incentives replaced with "dialogue". Just like those activists, HRF is a fraudulent organization whose non-profit status should be revoked. Furthermore, their connections to Russian imperialists and controlled opposition – who are literally on their board of directors – should be investigated thoroughly by the court system.

In the meanwhile, if you want to actually help stop tyranny, donate money to one of the many Ukrainian military organizations who are defeating Russia by killing Russians more effectively. Most of them even accept Bitcoin, e.g. https://wildhornets.com/en/ and https://savelife.in.ua/en/

nostr:nevent1qqszzc5kd5wuy7fd8dxawjlh0xv6vaq9yc5d9j336xp0eukeg2l82xspr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9srqsqqqqqp4rc38y

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why do you post receipts of your own Ls?

Just change your bad opinions.

US backed coups have consequences.

Agreed.

It’s amazing how much propaganda one guy can swallow.

Sadly true. Though, to give him credit, he wouldn’t be on a site like this if he was fully brainwashed like the machine would like him to be.

That being said, most people are so painfully unaware about how the entire cultural zeitgeist of the west was entirely rewritten by Marxist and occultist intellectuals after the world wars.

At this point, most people can’t even identify Marxist thinking they’ve been forced into the way a fish doesn’t know the ocean.

Was the Ukrainian People's Republic of 1919-1921 also a US-backed coup?

Wasn’t a coup, it was a fight for Independence after the Jewish Bolsheviks overthrew the Russian Empire in 1917.

US didn’t get in the Coup business until 1947.

“Best Estimate (Based on Known Evidence):

• Over 80 attempted or successful regime change operations according to historian Lindsey O’Rourke, whose work draws from declassified U.S. documents and academic research.

• Of these, at least 20–30 are widely considered to be successful coups that replaced governments, often in favor of U.S.-aligned or anti-communist regimes.

Well-Documented U.S.-Backed Coups Include:

1. Iran (1953) – CIA and British MI6 overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.

2. Guatemala (1954) – CIA ousted President Jacobo Árbenz.

3. Congo (1960–1961) – U.S. helped remove and facilitate the murder of Patrice Lumumba.

4. Brazil (1964) – U.S. supported a military coup against President João Goulart.

5. Chile (1973) – U.S. supported the military coup that overthrew Salvador Allende, bringing Pinochet to power.

6. Indonesia (1965–66) – U.S. supported the military’s purge of communists and suspected sympathizers, leading to Suharto’s rise.

7. Honduras (2009) – Though officially denied, the U.S. gave tacit support to the coup against President Manuel Zelaya.

Other Notable Interventions That Shaped or Supported Coups:

• Vietnam (1963) – U.S. involvement in the overthrow and assassination of President Diem.

• Libya (2011) – Not a coup in the classic sense, but U.S./NATO involvement contributed to the collapse of Gaddafi’s regime.

• Venezuela (2002) – U.S. was aware of and sympathetic to the coup against Hugo Chávez, though did not directly orchestrate it.”

I'm not ready to talk about topics other that Ukraine, because I don't have enough knowledge. By your phrase and context I understood that you think that maidan was us-backed coup. I don't think so.

It was a coup and it’s well documented.

why can't trump stop the war if the original reason was us backing?

I argue the base premise.

The Socratic method is objectively superior to Marxist dialectic, yet it is the latter that reigns supreme in public consciousness. “Progress” is not inevitable and humanity has stumbled backward several times in history as proof of that. The Bronze Age collapse caused nearly every major civilization of the time to lose writing as a technology, for one example.

But, for our current society, force, coercion, and government-corporate collusion has done plenty to bury or destroy MANY superior ideas. It is only very recently that the first crucial steps to Renaissance old good ideas have been taken, and they will still take another generation or two to return to being the mainstream assumptions the way they once were.

1) You may not like HRF’s strategy but we are not “fraudulent” — actually you do a pretty good job explaining what we do here. We pursue non-violent activism. You seem to have a good grasp on this. We do not lie about this or defraud anyone. And if we did openly fund warfare, then our non profit status would probably need to be revoked.

2) Yulia is not “controlled opposition” — her husband represented the single greatest threat to Putin and to Russian imperialism, which is why he was murdered. If you think President Navalny would have conducted this invasion of Ukraine you have been brainwashed

3) If you think warfare is the answer, why don’t you join the Ukrainian army on the front lines?

RETODD PLEASE. PLEASE JOIN UKHRAINIANS ON THE FRONT LINES FAM.

Navalny is known in Ukraine by his phrase "Crimea is not a sandwich" (Крым не бутерброд). When Navalny was asked if russia has to return Crimea to Ukraine he said no. Yulia Navalny is known in Ukraine by constantly repeating that war in Ukraine is only putins war, meaning that russians is not responsible and don't want this war. Almost every ukrainian has relatives in russia, we talked with them a lot in the past, and we know that they support this war.

Nonsense. He was murdered because of his opposition to Putin’s imperial policies. He made the ultimate sacrifice

1. I did not deny Navalny's self-sacrifice.

2. What exactly is nonsense in my words? I stated two facts that you can verify yourself.

3. Navalny's criticism of the russian government was mainly about corruption. You won't find much criticism from Navalny about the war in Ukraine in 2014-2015, for example. Compare this, for example, with Boris Nemtsov, who was also killed by Putin and who was very popular in Ukraine, unlike Navalny.

this is Navalny tweet.

translation: "Clearly not rebels surrounded ukranians. And if something happens they will be killed not by rebels. And this is exposure at this moment"

first, Navalny uses offensive slang word for ukrainians (хохлы). second - he sais that russian military presence in donbass can be spotted and this is bad

The goal for the US with the Russia Ukraine war is to make Europe more dependent on them. This is mostly due to the private sector in Germany, who where the onces that decided to buy gass from Russia while the German government shut down all of their nuclear plants...

Now that Russia has invaded Ukraine, the only way to actually weaken the Russian imperialistic mindset is for Ukraine to win. If not they will continue to invade the neighbouring contries such as Estonia, Moldova and Georgia.

And for the last part, here is a qoute from Golda Meir:

"Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us."

History is written by the winners - irrespective of how good or bad their ideas are