I see what you’re saying, but there is merit in the concern around absolute obliteration of entire ecosystems that have maintained our climate for millennia.

Factory farming is fiat. Covering the earth in corn, soy, and wheat just to feed other farmed animals is fiat.

Destroying the lungs of our planet 🌳 in order to make a living is fiat.

Bitcoin is not carnivorous despite how many bitcoiners will tell you they only eat meat. That just feeds the fiat relationship with the environment even further.

Bitcoiners should grow their own food, their own plants, and their own meat.

Are you really self sovereign if you rely on someone else for the very nutrients you need to survive?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with all of those things being problems, but I don't seem them as related to the debate of whether CO2 is a good or bad thing. They are a problem in their own right without needing attachment to any other narrative. It's simply unsustainable practices and agricultural centralization through a parasitic financing system.

Unless I'm misunderstanding your point.

Yeah, I agree CO2 isn’t good or bad. Humans are just effecting the environment with our emissions, and that can have bad effects.