Nostr Web Client

Yes well there can also be others like NGOs charities etc.

The network will be governed by a foundation Trust similar to Linux foundation LFDT.

So the vote consensus and the trust foundations auditing will decide if an organisation is suitable.

I suppose at first there will be a reasonable need to rely on centralised systems.

However there is the obvious element of needing a certain amount of integration with the current system, otherwise its a pointless vote.

It will need to be a recognised digital voting authority otherwise its pointless.

More of a twitter poll than a political vote.

The view is to offer governments solutions to problems, they believe digital voting is not viable.

It is even with AI spoofing live video.

And can keep your data, the checking service will compare two bits of data and store only the cryptographic proof of it.

As for the vote you should be able to check afterwards if it was counted as you placed it.

Saberhagen The Nameless 8mo ago

I just find it hard to believe most governments would want to use this as it reduces their control. I think it is less about them thinking it is viable and more that the current systems works in their favor.

I do think ZK voting is a cool concept and could be useful and valued for smaller organizations and communities though.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

An0myl0u5 8mo ago

Well yeah but that's exactly the point and that's the struggle.

It's the modern day battlefield mate.

We fight like this for this, or fight like they did in the old days, a proper civil war. I don't think we will be given a choice whether we want the unrest or not.

I think we should do what we can to try rather than be defeatist just because they won't want it.

It's not a gift for you're partner, we are in a world wide humanitarian crisis, we need to force it on them.