I disagree. Humans will always organize themselves, even under an incorruptible, unconfiscatable, hard money system
Without the possibility of creating money out of thin air we’ll probably have better public servants. Nevertheless, they will still be subsidized via taxation
public servants is an oxymoron term.
It means literally slaves.
I’m no native speaker so out of my depth here.
I’d say that yes, public servant should not be a term for what in Spanish we call funcionario
But I don’t see why the term is an oxymoron. A servant, as long as he does it willingly, can decide to serve the general public or a private person or group
Whatever 😅
Long story just to say that anarchism is not the answer
Happy Friday!
>anarchism is not the answer
so statism is the answer?
Please explain this then
I never said that truth or good is what the majority says
I only said that if you eliminate government, people will always look for ways of organizing themselves
>organize themselves
watch and learn
part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pseCI0AxgM
part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aSG0_trfp8
part 3
I’ll watch it when I find 1.5 hours to dedicate to this
If it’s so obvious that a state-less society is the natural thing humans do, it’d be quicker if you pointed me to the thousands of real examples there must be about this in real life
No existe esa presentación en español? La traducción "al vuelo" de YouTube no es buena ni atinada... 😥
