Avatar
Alvaro
6a17f17efe5326d59edc4700a01f967fa2a034aa2c5e472c3e47ab86ebfaba97
Catholic, husband, father of four, friend, bitcoiner. Central banking is evil. Currency debasement is wrong. Bitcoin is a moral imperative.

I believe it was Antonio Machado who said it: caminante no hay camino, se hace camino al andar

Joan Manuel Serrat put that into a song. Very nice. If you don’t speak Spanish, translating the lyrics might make sense

Very true, at least for myself. Still, your own self is somewhat already conditioned in that way, so that it becomes quite a frustrating ā€œframeā€ to break or get out of

Probably the reason why every generation needs to do stuff different than the prior generation, indefinitely

True. But general opsec awareness and measures should be the default, and people are way to biased to overexposing themselves in centralized socials, and there is an entire generation that never knew anonymity (and the rest have forgotten). Speaking about a friend…

It seems like an appropriate disclaimer šŸ˜…

I believe parenthood somehow completes one’s self, as in giving its true purpose.

When you have kids, remember two pieces of advice of a random Nostr guy: 1, be generous, and have as many kids as you can. There is no greater joy and no greater ROI in life fulfillment. Low time preference always pays off. Al carajo with all those little, close-minded people that have two kids and no more because ā€œit’s enoughā€. Since when just this love is enough?

And 2, your job as a parent is to raise kids so that they are successful in leaving your nest. So, your number one priority, and the person who will remain after the kids leave, is your spouse. Treat your husband like when you were still dating even when you have kids.

There are few sure ways of ruining a marriage. Forgetting about the spouse and living solely for the kids is one of them.

PS. This applies for husbands exactly in the same way, but you mentioned you’re a wife

Here in Spain you have public kindergartens, but also private ones Among the private ones there are plenty of different options where one could pick from

Unfortunately they are always overbooked, at least in my experience

As long as non-KYC, I honestly don’t care about the technology behind. It should just work.

Of course, if custodial, I’ll never leave large amounts there

If only Bitcoin’s market cap were $200T and quantum was around the corner.

Oh yes, sir, would I freak then.

At $2T? Nobody cares, we’re not that important yet.

Hey, remember even thinking might not be permitted. I still remember the scene of the UK lady praying in front of an abortion clinic.

She was of course detained.

LOL. Will there be an inflection point that triggers social rebellion agains this?

Because, as you say, for all my friends, family and close circles, everything here is just fine

Though European, I am exposed to much more US-centric socials and news, so I might be biased.

Is the US more fucked up in terms of cultural destruction, or are we Europeans like sedated sheep, who cannot see the truth anymore, and our situation in terms of cultural decay and collective mistrust is even worse?

DAC8 is to my knowledge something that is going to be effective starting 2026. But from 2025 there was this Travel Rule, whereby information was also shared

I honestly don’t have a good understanding of all the details of all laws that are being passed, but the bottom line remains: Bisq and Robosats are more important than ever

True. But Bitcoin is much more than gold in so many ways. Through its verifiability we’re able to ā€œnot trust, but verify ā€œ.

This creates a very healthy dynamic whereby incentives are aligned, and people seek harmony within themselves, communities and nature.

Gold is just relatively sound money, which is very good in itself but does not create any relevant cultural shift.

Go to the best Australian MBA degree and ask them to put you in contact with the graduates looking for establishing a SEARCH FUND

They do the work, you put the money. High risk high reward business.

Ni de coƱa. Por 1M tampoco. Por 10M me lo pensarƭa, pero quizƔ tampoco. 100M serƭa mƔs difƭcil de rechazar, pero la pregunta es difƭcil. Cuanto vale tu libertad, y la futura libertad de tus hijos y nietos?

One thing is to be scared to disagree (see self-censorship on LinkedIn due to business reputation) and another thing is to openly call for an assassination

Maybe it’s normal if you grow up in the US with the first and second amendments, but for me seeing this from the other side of the pond this is WILD. To the level that a civil war is a non-zero probability event

Probably having a third established political party, to learn to see things not just in one axis, would help America stop having an us vs. them approach to everything

Replying to Avatar JeffG

For those wondering about my thoughts on nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqexv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9csna6fpr 's latest article about MLS. tl;dr - I think it's pretty balanced and describes something that we (and the MLS folks) have known from the start. If you have a centralized identity/authentication service telling you who is who, you are trusting them with a pretty important part of the system.

As he points out, NIP-EE (the spec about how to use MLS on Nostr) and, by extension, White Noise doesn't have the authentication service problem because Nostr is our AS. We use pubkeys for identity in groups and you're trusting the key package events signed by those keys when you're adding someone to a group. āœ…

In general, this is an issue for other MLS implementations though. The authentication service is a "trusted" third party, with all the trappings.

AFAICT, the "participation privacy" question is about relays being able to see what groups you're in via the group ID values you're requesting events for.

There are two points to make here. First, relays can see what group IDs a given IP address is requesting events for. I believe that we have mitigated this pretty well since we're using random (and rotating) identifier(s) for each group (yes, by design, a single group have more than one visible ID value at a time). Obviously, this is also mitigated by using a VPN or Tor to make requests to relays. We don't yet but White Noise will eventually break up these requests into lots of different reqs/subscriptions (probably done over Tor or something similar) to help here.

One thing that he didn't mention but is worth talking about; relays see events with a given "h" tag (the group ID I talked about above). Practically, this means that watching a given group ID value gives relays some idea of the relative amount of activity for a given group. Critically though, they can't see the number or identities of it's members, since all those messages are published via ephemeral keys. It's just a relative amount of activity (at least until the group rotates it's group ID).

Happy to answer more questions from folks on the article or on MLS.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqpxfzhdwlm3cx9l6wdzyft8w8y9gy607tqgtyfq7tekaxs7lhmxfqyvhwumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshszxnhwden5te0wdjkuerfwshxummnvekxzun99e3k7mf0qqsyyg7y3vx65xm4l6n4wns3wjj08htwswvt7r4du2e73tk9099gqzq82dzp2

Thank you - I read both the article and your comments and as a complete non technical I still could not find the answer to the question I’m interested in:

if a pleb just wants a completely private, sovereign and unhackable messaging app to chat with whomever he wants (mainly 1:1 chats and small groups): is simplex better than white noise, or the other way around?

What I wonder is whether when things go even souther than south we will have wanted to maintain anonymity all along, or whether that’s the point where war breaks out

How is being active measured? A daily interaction or just going into the clients app to see what’s up?

Also, the averages ā€œper userā€ seem way off

Servus!

I definitely can relate. For me it’s a bit infuriating to see how unable are people to think from first principles

I think all comes back to the tools they have to measure value, which unfortunately it’s only fiat for them

Bitcoin fixes this

I hope having babies becomes an answer to that for many 🫔

Can’t wrap my head around as to why there are so few big families among bitcoiners, at least that I know of

It’s counterintuitive to me.

Big family = peak low time preference + POW

Ahí va! Tocó temas con los que yo no he tenido contacto jamÔs, pero precisamente por eso me pareció muy interesante por lo refrescante del enfoque

https://open.spotify.com/episode/3XfJ7jfYnCyMhV1ojfUZKn?si=E0mCn45vRGamxKQXmVM0mA

Seguro que habrÔ su versión de YT u otras plataformas, no se que formato buscas

I couldn’t agree more!