Thanks, Obama https://m.primal.net/QXel.mov
Discussion
Why doesn't he just go live with his husband? Because he gets $400k appearance fee
Trying to save up until aiObama does those speeches and he's out of a job
I only care about automating the central bankers job with Bitcoin
Man he’s out of rhythm huh. A bit out of practice
Deflation is the key to an abundant future
This dude is such a self-righteous prick. The tone, the attitude, is pure hubris. It’s just gross. A malignant narcissist.
Your welcome nostr:nprofile1qqsxu35yyt0mwjjh8pcz4zprhxegz69t4wr9t74vk6zne58wzh0waycprfmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5hsz9mhwden5te0v96xcctn9ehx7um5wghxcctwvshs8ehcf7
nevent1qqswz5j35n79726sqakrs8fxc3qs9r22dh3yryjm0w5340y52cva34q4gels5
Are you sure this isn't Obama AI, ill answer that for you....no, you dont know for sure. This is the world we live in now.
LLMs are better than 60-70% of coders. 🤣 LOL.
Spoken from someone who has probably never coded in their life,
let alone even seen someone attempt to have any model code anything more than a simple demo,
let alone be able to maintain any code (which is the VAST majority of the life cycle of software).
These Silicon Valley folks are so good at selling their stories. If only they could also provide proof of work that their tech can do what they claim.
Yeah for real. For people to believe LLMs can do this is insane.
There are a lot of poor coders out there that don't surface in the famous companies. But it may be more appropriate to say it's better than 80-90% or people (or higher) at coding, which is also a significant achievement.
There’s a widespread misconception that AI will easily and imminently replace software developers, mainly because people equate coding with software development. But writing code is just one part of the process — and often the least time-consuming one.
In reality, software development is primarily about understanding complexity. It involves deeply analyzing business requirements, identifying edge cases, aligning with existing architecture, considering performance, security, scalability, maintainability, and ensuring seamless integration into existing workflows. This process typically takes up the majority of a developer’s time — well over 70–80%.
AI can be highly effective in generating boilerplate code, suggesting implementations, and automating low-level tasks. But AI operates within the scope it’s given. It lacks true domain understanding, context awareness, and the ability to reason about trade-offs across technical and organizational constraints.
In software architecture, every decision has consequences — from database schema design to API structure, from deployment strategy to error handling. These decisions require contextual judgment, a solid grasp of the business domain, and the ability to collaborate with stakeholders. AI doesn’t own responsibility; developers and architects do.
Therefore, AI is not a replacement for developers — it is a tool. A powerful one, yes, but one that augments human capability rather than replacing it. The creative, analytical, and strategic aspects of software engineering remain inherently human.
I agree with all of this, but we as developers should expect requirements gathering, architecture, planning etc to be increasingly aided by AI to the point that fewer engineers/managers are needed to oversee ambitious projects. We've gone from effectively no AI to PhD-level intelligence (in some respects) in five years or so, and AI is now recursively improving itself faster than humans can do it. We are in for big changes in our day to day and need to be cognizant that our skills today won't be as valuable tomorrow, and will remain in decline for the foreseeable future.
Absolutely, I agree. AI is evolving rapidly, and it’s already clear that many aspects of software development — from requirements gathering to architectural suggestions — will be increasingly AI-assisted. This will reduce the need for large teams and shift the focus of our roles.
But I see this as an opportunity. Just like past technological shifts, AI will automate the repetitive and amplify the strategic. Developers will move into higher-leverage roles: orchestrating AI, focusing on system design, user experience, and solving cross-domain problems.
Yes, the skills that matter will change — but those who adapt will find their work more impactful, creative, and future-proof than ever before.
He can eat a bag.
That's not even true, he's so full of shit. Better than 60% of coders my ass
This is the setup for Marxist "Post Labor Theory" which is just forming.
They are trying to use AI as an excuse to seize production and redistribute wealth and to create "equal outcome" for everyone.... aka communist equity.
Falsely claiming the commie universal basic income is the "obvious" solution.
🙄🙄
In my experience from using AI with my coding day job, it’s a huge helper in creating a starter base and when debugging - which is absolutely a big help. However, it cannot write a complete application. Not yet at least.
Wow. But somehow s&p is a required job. Ok đź‘Ť
Yikes man. I need another skill outside of programming
Even leaving aside his obvious conclusions of well then UBI and CBDC’s….
I’m in the Jevon’s Paradox camp on this one.
A US President that can actually use sophisticated English words! Oh my...!
Who's gonna verify the code O'crackhead?
We need a technology that can absorb the deflationary forces created by AI, giving us the peace of mind to focus on learning and creativity.
We already have one.
His lips are moving is the tell that he is lying again. He’s very good at it. Don’t be seduced.
The only thing we can really hope for is politicians saying “where am I gonna find a job?”
This looks and sounds like AI.
Bitcoin and chill
Suffering is for()getting the purpose.
Just saying...