Profile: 9e9374ab...

I enjoy this account but you're posting every two minutes and clogging my feed. May need to slow the cadence.

Windows is entirely unusable, how do you people do this every day

To crack a single key using Shor's algorithm would require about $30k in energy with tens of megawatts continuously needed using estimates extrapolated from today's capacity. It would take 30 minutes to 8 hours with around 2500 logical qubits (estimated requirement to crack a key).

Those 2,500 logical qubits require approximately 13 million physical qubits due to error correction overhead. Current quantum computers only have 100-2,000 physical qubits. We're roughly four orders of magnitude away from this capability.

The most powerful quantum computers today have a bit more than 1000 physical qubits, and about 12 logical qubits. Physical qubits are doubling every 9-12 months.

Major companies project:

IBM: 100,000 physical qubits by 2033; 2,000 qubits by 2029

Google: Fault-tolerant quantum computer by 2029

Quantinuum: Fault-tolerant system with 1,000+ logical qubits by 2030

Fujitsu/RIKEN: 1,000 physical qubits by 2026

So they think we're still a half decade from being two+ orders of magnitude away from BTC being at risk. If it moves quickly we might see this around 2031-2034. A more pessimistic growth ramp puts it closer to 2040. Whoever does it will need to invest a ton of money into the computers and energy needed to crack each individual key. There will only be a few computers in the world able to do this initially and it's unlikely they'd use those resources to crack Bitcoin keys.

Why are people suddenly complaining about this now?

The lower it goes the more righteous I feel.

Mandibles was hyperbolic to the extreme

Oh no! Political diversity as a result of democratic elections! Everybody panic!

Jack is a scion of a fiat elite family. Not that that's a bad thing and I don't know his exact situation but Strike customers should know where he comes from

Just one of those days

With my setup I can perform the work of three full time domain expert engineers simultaneously while still holding down my salary work pretty easily. I can't imagine what this will feel like when I can do the work of a hundred or thousand engineers while I sip coffee on my porch.

Was the liquidation cascade yesterday a bullet to the heart or a starting gun? Seems like these events are usually one or the other. The black swan-ish nature of this one reminds me of the covid drop. Different part of the cycle especially since we're knocking on ATHs and historical cycles rolled over around this point but I am hopeful, or maybe just at peace with my portfolio (despite the drawdowns in my degen account). The barbell strategy works...

Not much value left in the Twitter feed. Very little. More danger in frying your brain on For You than value from signal, honestly. It's all posturing and bots.

The money printer is behind it but they money they printed is still out there and the money printer is warming up again.

My boss's boss's boss is the wealthiest person in the world. So I got that going for me

I found a DCA strategy that accumulated 22% more BTC over straight DCA when back tested on the last 3 years (40% over 12 years). Intriguing

US buying Intel gives US incentive to protect Intel against potential competitors, even those that emerge from the US. US incentive is then to prioritize a dinosaur

Replying to Avatar 3eppo

There’s a widespread misconception that AI will easily and imminently replace software developers, mainly because people equate coding with software development. But writing code is just one part of the process — and often the least time-consuming one.

In reality, software development is primarily about understanding complexity. It involves deeply analyzing business requirements, identifying edge cases, aligning with existing architecture, considering performance, security, scalability, maintainability, and ensuring seamless integration into existing workflows. This process typically takes up the majority of a developer’s time — well over 70–80%.

AI can be highly effective in generating boilerplate code, suggesting implementations, and automating low-level tasks. But AI operates within the scope it’s given. It lacks true domain understanding, context awareness, and the ability to reason about trade-offs across technical and organizational constraints.

In software architecture, every decision has consequences — from database schema design to API structure, from deployment strategy to error handling. These decisions require contextual judgment, a solid grasp of the business domain, and the ability to collaborate with stakeholders. AI doesn’t own responsibility; developers and architects do.

Therefore, AI is not a replacement for developers — it is a tool. A powerful one, yes, but one that augments human capability rather than replacing it. The creative, analytical, and strategic aspects of software engineering remain inherently human.

I agree with all of this, but we as developers should expect requirements gathering, architecture, planning etc to be increasingly aided by AI to the point that fewer engineers/managers are needed to oversee ambitious projects. We've gone from effectively no AI to PhD-level intelligence (in some respects) in five years or so, and AI is now recursively improving itself faster than humans can do it. We are in for big changes in our day to day and need to be cognizant that our skills today won't be as valuable tomorrow, and will remain in decline for the foreseeable future.