Bitcoin is information, which can move light speed, since it has no mass.
Bitcoin does not require trust. Anyone can review the code, and run whichever version they desire, as long as it obeys the rules that everyone else agrees to. Who cares who designed it... How about the number 0? Can you trust that 0 is a valid concept and not a trick, if you don't know who came up with the idea?
51% attack, Bitcoin breaking, quantum computing, government attack, you are not the 1st to ask these questions ...if you are truly curious, keep learning! Do you like books or podcasts? I will post some useful research.
"Bitcoin does not require trust. Anyone can review the code, and run whichever version they desire, as long as it obeys the rules that everyone else agrees to. Who cares who designed it... How about the number 0? Can you trust that 0 is a valid concept and not a trick, if you don't know who came up with the idea?"
My counter-argument to that statement, is: Do you trust that the NSA didn't build in a backdoor into SHA-256? Or are you a mathematician, and have you verified this extensively yourself, especially considering they already did this with Dual EC DRBG? The only statements I can find are "the cryptographic community *TRUSTS* in SHA-256 for security". That's a dangerous game you're playing with an NSA asset.
some things I have to take on faith, I'm not a computer scientist, or a mathematician. many other people that are, have reviewed the code...I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but I fly on airplanes.
there are always tail risks, you might die in a plane crash, Bitcoin might have a hidden flaw...which it has before. An inflation bug was found, fixed, and Bitcoin survived. If there is a problem, the software is open source, and the incentive is to fix it!
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed