Bitcoin isn’t a hedge against anything, it’s a replacement for the current monetary system.

Trading some vegetables is one thing…how do you make a pencil, without money?

Yes, gold destroyed every other softer money: glass beads in Africa, silver in India and China, and countless other examples throughout history: hard money destroys the wealth of those holding soft money.

The problem with gold is it was too slow for the 20th century. It had low salability across space. That’s where banking, gold receipts, and later currencies took over. They had greater salability across space than gold. The tradeoff was that gold had to be centralized into banks. This required trust, that there was actual gold to back the receipts for gold. Eventually humans being humans, that trust is violated. Bitcoin requires no trust. It’s like moving a gold coin at the speed of light - no receipt, or currency backed by it, is required - it is a bearer asset. It can remain decentralized, like physical gold coins, yet move at light speed anywhere. It solves the salability across space better than currency, and is even more salable across time than gold.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

😂 Farmers feed cities.

Also, Bitcoin moving at light speed?🤣

That's not even how things work.

Where is the trust in Bitcoin when we don't even have the designer's real identity? And you fail to even mention the 51% attack problem.

"It solves the salability across space better than currency, and is even more salable across time than gold."

What does this even mean?? 🤣🤣🤣

Gold: invented forever ago. Always salable.

Bitcoin: invented 15 years ago. Salable until it's broken.

Bitcoin is information, which can move light speed, since it has no mass.

Bitcoin does not require trust. Anyone can review the code, and run whichever version they desire, as long as it obeys the rules that everyone else agrees to. Who cares who designed it... How about the number 0? Can you trust that 0 is a valid concept and not a trick, if you don't know who came up with the idea?

51% attack, Bitcoin breaking, quantum computing, government attack, you are not the 1st to ask these questions ...if you are truly curious, keep learning! Do you like books or podcasts? I will post some useful research.

"Bitcoin does not require trust. Anyone can review the code, and run whichever version they desire, as long as it obeys the rules that everyone else agrees to. Who cares who designed it... How about the number 0? Can you trust that 0 is a valid concept and not a trick, if you don't know who came up with the idea?"

My counter-argument to that statement, is: Do you trust that the NSA didn't build in a backdoor into SHA-256? Or are you a mathematician, and have you verified this extensively yourself, especially considering they already did this with Dual EC DRBG? The only statements I can find are "the cryptographic community *TRUSTS* in SHA-256 for security". That's a dangerous game you're playing with an NSA asset.

some things I have to take on faith, I'm not a computer scientist, or a mathematician. many other people that are, have reviewed the code...I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but I fly on airplanes.

there are always tail risks, you might die in a plane crash, Bitcoin might have a hidden flaw...which it has before. An inflation bug was found, fixed, and Bitcoin survived. If there is a problem, the software is open source, and the incentive is to fix it!

modern world wide web, only been around since 1991, do you think it will fail, and we go back to the reliable old telegraph?