Nostr Web Client

Replying to

Matthew Kratter

Emergency Bitcoin Soft Fork

https://blossom.primal.net/f8e877b4d461f9a31e19e59f77338c5e7e97c3cde4f58c9a03ee59a27decbf28.mp4

Nate 2mo ago

The argument fails where it implies legal liability for other people's actions.

I have not looked at 99% of the blocks in the chain. No idea what is in them. Don't care. Not liable for their contents

Its like arguing that I am an accessory to money laundering bc one block contains money laundering transactions

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

DireMunchkin 2mo ago

I am not a lawyer, but wouldn't you also need to delete the illegal data?

This would be impossible to comply with as a Bitcoin node runner. You need an intact blockchain to run a full node. Scary situation if so.

ihsotas 2mo ago

If the illegal content was in the prunable part of the ledger ie the op_return people could run nodes free from content. The real issue is that these clowns think blocks every ten minutes with 4mb max is a viable data storage strategy. These are not serious people.

BTC-Satan 2mo ago

CSAM law do not operate that way. The Core V30 nodes all over AWS would be a BIG problem for Amazon.