Provided climate change is a scam, does that mean we shouldn't be looking at soils erosion, biodiversity loss, desertification, deforestation, water cycle polution, etc? Would it mean that there isn't any problem with the western's anthropocentric view of the world? Can we simply keep going exchanging the health of the environment for a sick growth economy?

ps: Is it possible that climate is being affected by economic activity, planeteary movement and geoenginering at the same time?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good questions.

Look for the real root causes as it may change the solutions.

If it’s not carbon dioxide causing the issue, don’t waste precious time and resources capturing it to put in the earth.

Focus on real pollution and poisons.

The point with my questions was to open a dialogue that can embrace complexities and nuances. For instance, whether or not climate change is a hoax, the level of carbon in agricultural soils plummeted during the decades of the 'Green Revolution'. The more SOC (Soil Organic Carbon), the more individual plant species and plant families per square metre, the higher the nutritional leval, the water infiltration and soil agregation. None of this, which is a life and death matter for everyone, is discussed in the recent polarised debates about whether or not climate change is a hoax. To make things worse, the majority of those saying it's a hoax, argue that to keep business as usual (and business as usual do not address the root cause as needed and as you pointed out very well).