The point with my questions was to open a dialogue that can embrace complexities and nuances. For instance, whether or not climate change is a hoax, the level of carbon in agricultural soils plummeted during the decades of the 'Green Revolution'. The more SOC (Soil Organic Carbon), the more individual plant species and plant families per square metre, the higher the nutritional leval, the water infiltration and soil agregation. None of this, which is a life and death matter for everyone, is discussed in the recent polarised debates about whether or not climate change is a hoax. To make things worse, the majority of those saying it's a hoax, argue that to keep business as usual (and business as usual do not address the root cause as needed and as you pointed out very well).