People that fall into scam we're not forced to fall into it, there's free will about it. There's no free will in rape.
Discussion
So, if someone sells you poisoned food, it's your fault because you gave your money willingly?
According to EltrincaGoti you chose to die then!
I never wrote that.
But you say: Giving money to someone is consent to being scammed.
So buying food is consent to being poisoned.
I only repeat what you said on other examples. And it shows you that you are wrong but selective perception won't let you even think about being wrong here.
So there's no difference between scam and robbery?
The underlying scheme is robbery. Though scammers use more sophisticated ways to get your money or property than robbers. But they both rob you.
Can you choose not to invest in a scam? Can you choose not to be robbed? One you can say no, the other you cannot. That's the point
I can say "no" to invest in a scam when I know it is a scam. When it is an investmentproposal I only say yes to the investment.
It's exactly the point. You can decide to go out on the street. But you are not responsible for being robbed. Same goes for investing.
Can we agree that if a person falls into a scan the person has some responsibility for that choice, while a person being robbed has zero responsibility about it?
No, it's a different thing with different consequences. A scammer robbed you money, the scammer should be condemned to pay reparations (good luck with that) but no jail(which a lot of innocent people pay its costs). If someone poison you and you die, that person should face death penalty IMO.
But there is no free will in getting scammed. They wanted to invest and get rewarded. No consent on being scammed here.
Again: Giving money is not a consent to being scammed, as well as dressing sexy in the public is not a consent to being raped.
Or another example: When you die in a car accident because you walked on the street you did not give consent to a car killing you, or did you?
Or you buy a knive for the kitchen. But you don't give consent to be killed by this knive.
I could drop more examples but your selective perception will render them wrong.
If you bought ethereum or dogecoin, were you forced to do so?
No. But you did not give consent to being scammed just by buying it. I know you need to feel better than people that also buy altcoins. But you will get better by getting better by yourself not by making other people bad.
Was a raped girl forced to dress sexy?
Was a person, that was killed in a car accident, forced to go out on the street?
Was snow white forced to eat the apple?
People get scammed because they didn't study or analyse things before investing, it's their responsibility. But I didn't say that the scammer is innocent, I said the scammer should not go to jail, it seems like your confusing scam with robbery they're different things. Your first comparison was rape, there's no free will to the victim of rape.
Those example makes no sense, and I never say they do. A woman dressing sexy is not a consent to rape, you're supposing I believe it or agree with it. I don't.
But when giving money to someone is consent to being scammed, then you'd have to agree on the mentioned examples. Otherwise it is what most bitcoin only plebs do: Selective perception.
And that's exactly what I am trying to say: It is nonsense what you say by using other applying what you said in other examples.
No, there's difference between aggressions evolving free will and those that does not. And you also add as example a car incident, which is a totally different thing.