Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Leo Fernevak

I would make a general distinction:

Artists create art whereas people who write a prompt are commissioning an AI to make something for them. The person who commission a piece doesn't create it.

Detailed AI art is not appreciated among artists since the algorithms steal art and details from artists without consent. No artists have been asked for their agreement. Some algorithms are also trained to remove watermarks, to hide how the art is embedded as a collage in the final result.

In human-created art there is a person with experiences inside the artwork. There is a soul in there. In every design-decision there is a result of creativity and personality. Our decisions inherit our unique outlook.

Generated art: you didn't create that. That's not your voice. That is not your personality speaking.

If there is no person behind the artwork it doesn't mean anything for me. There is nobody there to connect with.

Avatar
Seth 2y ago

Is an artist an artist without the paintbrush as a tool? AI is just a tool, just like the paintbrush.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
apa 2y ago

But’s it’s a tool that requires much less creative input or originality from the creator.

Avatar
Seth 2y ago

I think that is subjective. It’s hard to measure art in a qualitative means. I’m optimistic that it will create new paradigms for art and make us appreciate the hand crafted art more.

Avatar
apa 2y ago

I can buy that.

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed