“The free-speech discussion is a distraction; the discussion should be around free-will”
“We’re being programmed”
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m
Discussion
I saw the film free willy!
We are not the same 😂
"We're being programmed"
-> We're being de-humanized
He’s right. Severely programmed.
oof
Wow! Chapeau bas and very right 💯
Kind of like
“Jack wasn’t really in control of twitter when they were censoring everyone”
Like that kind of being programmed? Is that what he is referring to?
I can teach you how to turn your $150 into $5,300 in just 2hours without sending money to anyone
Text No:+1(209)207-5967
WhatsApp:+1(209)207-5967
WhatsApp link below 👇 👇👇👇
“Oslo Freedom” in the country where the majority of governing politicians want to outlaw bitcoin mining.
FREE - WILL "the faculty by which a person decides on and initiates action" ☀️
A discussion? Alright, I'll give a poor attempt.
Are these programmed humans morally responsible and punishable for their actions?
No.
Ok … now what?
Then we can't blame the programmed for trying to program 🤷♂️ It's what they do
True also. Humans.
Correct.
Perhaps, we have this philosophically reversed. Mayhaps it's the responsibility of those who choose to resist indoctrination to protect those who hold a preference for it. Perhaps, we're always getting this wrong. 🤷♂️
Maybe. 🤔
I'm still on the fence on what free-will actually is if humans can be "programmed" at all. What's to say those against indoctrination weren't "programmed" themselves?
It’s what we do. We’re social animals, biologically wired to need (and thrive in) the company of others. “Survival of the fittest”, for us, involves “programming” others to react (and desire) as we want them to.
Humans do this. Some do it better. None are immune.
Social animals sure, but specifically political animals.
It's more like "survival of the good enough" 😆
The way you put things sounds a bit like machiavellian manipulation, but I think I get the point. From family and community to a larger culture, all reinforce their preferred behaviours and wills in people.
I was referring specifically to state-run indoctrination. There's a core fundamental difference in letting someone (the state) "program" you and choosing how you wish to be "programmed".
Choosing a source of indoctrination as better than any other(ie, community, family, culture) is arbitrary or part of the pre-existing indoctrination.
State or otherwise, if humans can be programmed what's the threshold for free-will?
Humans naturally have a partially arbitrary nature, as only the minority are capable of effective leadership and commitment to any kind of progression. Most are cowards and will be terrified to commit to anything that they know will place them under pressure.
An individual always has free will. And nature itself always chooses the proper "disorder", not order. I know how insane it sounds, but the whole concept of order is binary. Order and disorder are not different. They form some type of totality.
🍻
i wish jack would fund my start up in person.