Like I get you think this will make the Nazis and pedos upset, but those people will do bad stuff if they are upset or not.
Removing one of their safe spaces isn't going to make them anymore dangerous than they already were
nostr:npub1mznweuxrjm423au6gjtlaxmhmjthvv69ru72t335ugyxtygkv3as8q6mak I've followed your work for years. I'm genuinely grateful for your journalism, especially your defense of privacy, censorship-resistance and Tornado Cash.
That's why I'm confused seeing you say "more of this please" about the ccc incident. It seems counterproductive and contradictory to everything you've stood for. If infrastructure destruction based on ideology is acceptable, what principle protects Tornado Cash users, privacy tools, or any other infrastructure that powerful actors decide is "dangerous"?
I genuinely don't understand how this aligns with the principles you've defended before. Can you help me understand what I'm missing?
Discussion
No replies yet.