Nostr Web Client

I got some feedback today that the BitSatRelay messages might be looking spammy ? anyone got any alternative ideas how we insert off grid messages/discussion from people that post / want to receive off grid only ?

Tom 3w ago

If you can prevent if from rebroadcasts unless requested then it would help. I get notifications about messages I've sent that it's rebroadcast and it's duplicating messages inline to the chat.

Make it react to nostr:nprofile1qqs27vuc5hrf8q0d42ygzqywx99axr54azewn2lkggctys7n709mkcqprpmhxue69uhkzapwdehhxarjwahhy6mn9e3k7mf0qys8wumn8ghj7cnfw3ekzapwd4hkcmmwd3skyefwdphkcerfdenhxtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0cu0h6p in messages to rebroadcast, for example, like the AI Calle had on here where you can ask it to reply to a question.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nikos 3w ago

noted. but let me ask you this. You are off grid with no internet to any web relay other than your own relay that only has the bitsatrelay up down link... if your off grid with no internet how will your client pull the events to show you the discussion content ?

if i dont rebroadcast the received satellite message how will the off grid user reply to the internet connected side ?

if you are off grid or lost centralised coms you cant then ping the system to activate your off grid request.

the system is built with the off grid user in mind first .. then the internet connected user.. you lot see doubles and quotes.. the off grid user dont see anything else other than what the bitsatrelay quoted and included in his message... including the content to which the off grid user replied to.

lets keep this discussion going.. as nostr:npub1cn670f663n3ks02jnnlsvd5y88zjnefy8343ykaxs7y3nzzketrsrjwt8a mentioned this today . I down to making changes - as long as those dont impact the offgrid user primary requirement.

on another note.. you guys not tried the DM to DM via the BItsatrelay ? to be fair .. we could shut down the social media side of the SatRelay and only have it work for DM to DM without any public messages on social side ...

Tom 3w ago

If I only have a link via the bitsatrelay satellite then it must be able to know I'm communicating with it directly, or if not, having an @ tag in the message to indicate that re-relaying it is requested.

It's cool tech but having over half my notifications be unrequested bitsatrelay events is ott.

Tom 3w ago

This is what it looks like:

Nikos 3w ago

but what you saying can just be done on the client.. just disable the wss relay.. on my iris client i just slide the tab over and disable the wss for the satellite.. then just a click and next message goes out via the sat as well... if you dont send your message to the sat relay it wont relay .... i dont understand why we suggesting to clip the systems wings when the user can just not use it ...

or am i missing something ? is the other sides replies and quotes that tag you the annoying part ? again if so how do you suggest we approach this architecture.. because soon we want to add a 3 layer with lora mesh messages... somehow the internet connected users will have 3 ways... mesh message received... sat message received.. etc... again.. the goal of this system is to distribute connectivity optins... we ought to have a spaces / tech hall to discuss / brainstorm this. nostr:npub1c03rad0r6q833vh57kyd3ndu2jry30nkr0wepqfpsm05vq7he25slryrnw .. your thoughts ?

Tom 3w ago

Yeah it's the mirroring of all my activity that's not necessary, I showed my notifications above in the screenshot, it's just copies of messages or copies of boosts etc.

It's not on my relay list, I only ever used it via cli in order to send directly to it.

Currently I can't stop it unless I block it, which is why it feels spammy.

Nikos 3w ago

I think the issue is your end buddy ... you are still sending your Kind 1 messages via the satellite relay .. here is the log from the system.. you can see the last one a few min ago..