Note they specify as tested levels were at a 10mm distance. They don't tell you what the levels they tested were. No mention of SAR or power level at any frequency the device is capable of emitting. Literally none of the information required to figure out what constitutes safe exposure distance is in those screenshots.

I promise you that was written by lawyers not RF engineers.

Also no mention of what type of harm you may experience by exceeding safe exposure. I'm sure anyone passing this shit around either doesn't know or denies the well studied and understood difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation.

People more terrified of the milliwatt radios than the road flare batteries are scientifically illiterate.

If you want to turn your life upside down because your thighs or buttcheecks may end up a tiny fraction of a degree different temperatures go nuts. You'll get a lot closer by making sure you are always facing directly toward or away from the sun than moving your phone. The physical insulation the phone provides has a bigger warming effect than the radios.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The whole foundation of the Wireless Safety standards is built on the premise that

If the amount of RF radiation you receive during a 6-minute phone call does not raise your tissue temperature by more than 1°C

Then it’s automatically SAFE

That’s it.

That’s the ENTIRE metric.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqqgd7ry53l56k4xjedl2gg8l5zx409vfsxmw568g8248avka8uz6qqsqlxsxnsyqh5cgr3n8yku53u802ef0yk8d0hpfnxh75rcjk5yvwzs72ek9c