Is all fucking show. If he was a threat he would have never been (s)elected. Or he'd be dead. You really think they forgot to cheat in 2016 and 2024? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe, or maybe they're not omnipotent, and they’re losing power now. Throughout history regimes gained and lost power, none are permanent.

His actions matter. His words mean nothing. He has done nothing but push the Agenda forward. He is pushing RealID. He is pushing border biometrics. He gave Palantir the master key to every American's data. He is running cover for the Epstein mess. He locked the nation down. He signed off on Warp Speed. He ran up TRILLIONS in debt. He is giving us de-facto CBDCs through stable coins. There is not a single thing he has ever done while in office that did anything but advance the techofascist takeover. Nothing he has done has benefitted anyone but the billionaire class, the MIC, the banksters and the medical mafia. His policies are destructive to real people.

Different debate. He has an agenda obviously. Some parts are good — the RFK vaccine press conference was great. Prosecuting Comey is great, closing the border is great, cutting off USAID is great.

He did lock the country down, very bad. He did authorize the vax, though he’s not the one who mandated it. I don’t agree stable coins = CBDC. It’s possible it’ll go that way, but maybe not.

But whether you like his policies or not is a different debate from whether he’s an actual threat to the prior regime.

Why the douchy response? We are having a conversation, we disagree.

You ignore reality and his actions. He was gonna 'lock her up' in 2016. He was gonna arrest Obama earlier this year. He was gonna release the 'Epstein files'. He was gonna end all the wars. He has done nothing at all that could lead anyone to believe he is a threat to the system. One does not sit in the WH cuz they are a threat. They get there because they are selected to be there. You really think they would put a retard like Kamala up against a threat? No they put her up to guarantee his 'win'.

Maybe, but you really believe “they” are omnipotent, and I don’t. I think “they” are just people and as such are highly fallible and delusional. And they fucked up.

I also don’t think Trump is my friend. He has HIS agenda, it’s not my agenda. But there is SOME overlap. Certainly more than with the previous regime.

There is one regime. Its called DC. Changing a puppet changes nothing. There is nothing better or worse between Trump and Biden. Same shit, different toilet. Two wings one vultue.

Strong disagree. Trump is far from perfect, but he’s a person with an agenda, and that agenda differs from that of the blob that ran things under Biden’s fake presidency. Thank God he won and not Harris. I shudder to think how bad things would have gotten had she won.

Yea, an agenda to put us in a digital prison. RealID, biometics to travel, biometrics to leave or return to the US. Trllions in debt. More wars. Gave Palantir access to ALL our data. ICE is using the same facial recognotion software that was used to hunt down J6 protesters. He is surrounded by the tech billionaires who view us a a source of data, not as humans. He has a Soros affiliate running Treasury. What could Kalama have done that is possibly worse than that? She wouldnt have gotten anything done she is retarded. If he was a threat, he wouldnt be in office its that simple

Everything you say presumes an omnipotent regime. I’m saying they are NOT omnipotent, people they don’t like CAN get into power. Will Trump do everything you’re saying? It’s possible. But it’s also possible that’s not what’s happening.

If Kamala had won, they would have tried to go after people for free speech. Europe would have followed suit all-in rather than having to fight with Trump. The scoldy woke douchebags who presume they’re better than you based on who they vote for and who you vote for (or didn’t vote for) would be staffing every layer of government. We’d be living in an HR department-like nanny state.

The reason we know this is that Kamala isn’t a person with an agenda. She’s just an apparatchik who does what she’s told, and what’s she’s told would be more of the last five years of hell.

Trump is trying to suppress speech. His anti-semistism EO, Bondi wanting hate speech laws. What rock are you living under? Everything people claimed Kamala would do is being done by Trump. Wake the hell up.

What rock are YOU living under? Bondi had to walk that shit back within hours! The anti-semitism shit IS bad, I won’t argue that. But the prior admin literally had a “disinformation bureau” and never walked ANYTHING back. I’m critical of Trump all the time, but the idea there’s no difference, it’s all the same thing is just not credible to me.

That she said it is more than enough. They are targetting speech. That is a fact.

no, they’re really not with that one exception. We’d be Keir Starmer’s UK if Kamala had won.

And a person's covid would have been worse without the jab. You are making the same, unprovable, claim. Doesnt matter what might have happened. What matters is what is happening. And he is going after speech.

That’s a poor analogy. You SHOULD be critical of Trump. More criticism = more pressure to back off. But the idea that it’s just as bad as the prior regime re speech is just not remotely credible IMO.

Well I guess its better to be stabbed that it is be shot then. Evil is evil. Tyranny is tyranny. The degree of either is irrelevant and what might have happened with Kamala has zero relevance. What IS happening is the only thing that matters. You're are cheering on all of our enslavement. But at least its not Kamala. A digital prison is a digital prison. Dont matter who is doing it.

All governments are tyrannical, but not all governments are EQUALLY tyrannical.

Tyranny is tyranny.