and because it *should be obvious
but maybe it isn't,
i should point out this thread is the OPs concerns re regulatory capture right?
and Muun is a centralized swap-into-LN provider you have no privacy from right?
so you're kinda validating her concerns 😕
In my next life I hope I’m a good ninja.
🥷
If (captured)
Then fork
We already have other good options.
I'm not sure theres any reason for a fork.
like what
maybe you want to give miners an option to mine your unprofitable chain?
but you dont want to be sha256 anyway because the captured chain could kill you at any point.
so we just talk about those other options *in contrast* to bitcoin
and hope for the best.
Why?
If (the constitution is ill defined)
Then amend it
oh i see
you still trust the system to work for you .
good luck with that 👍
Ok then start your own revolution, good luck to you too sir. 😄
Bitcoin IS the revolution
Exactly my point.
No.
its really not.
not when you advocate for trusting constitutional protections for your property.
Bitcoin has to do it *without their protection* to be a revolution.
You’re projecting your personal views onto the analogy.
It’s a simple analogy of how change works in an “established” system. The original point stand. You’re just getting distracted with the analogy now.
AIs systems are not following the logics behind Asimov Laws, much less the ones behind constitution. The problem goes down deeper.
Muun is cool
and using LN in El Zonte is cool
its just not solving the problem Bitcoin was designed to solve
