How does this piece advance bitcoin or bridge the devide of the community?
Discussion
it helps knots users know what they are getting into, considering so many people are saying they plan on switching. how is this not helpful?
most of this content is stuff many pro-core people were already aware of, clearly it is not well known or there would be more hesitation to adopt a fork by luke.
i've always said if people care so much about this one PR someone should just make a fork of v30 with this single change reverted.
you don't need to run core with hundreds of god-knows-what changes on top
this would be a lot easier to rebase as well
What is a woman?
Could that someone be you (or another in your camp), if it's really that simple to defuse and settle this debate? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I just don't want bitcoin's prospects of success and fruition to be threatened, whether by Cnots or Kore.
As someone whose contribution to bitcoin is little more than adoption and advocacy, I have no technical authority as to which, if either, is a threat or not. The whole debate is a minefield of overwhelming information with 360 degrees of crossfire, and many throughout the community are exhausted, but hopeful for a sensible resolution.
It seems to me like you just offered one. I would love to see you follow through, if that's really all it takes. Thanks either way for your huge contribution to bitcoin code development and nostr damus, too. Your recent appearance on the titcoin podcast with Walker was a joy to listen to. ✌
no I don’t want to attack bitcoin and make the spam situation worse
Let me guess, you guys would call it a dangerous one-man-show right after it got forked right? Eventhough its all of core's work with just a couple of reverted changes?
It clearly doenst stop us to run Knots, everyone knows Luke is an autist. It just seems like a helpless attack TBH, which will just increase the devide.
Since we're all history buffs now let's remember how Lopp was on the big block shitcoiner side of the block size war, at least until the rats left the sinking ship. Some things never change. https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/elegant-and-ass-backward-jameson-lopps-first-impression-of-bitcoin/
Ahhh I see…. Makes sense.
The worst part about knots is Luke. If the code was properly secured and maintained it would be a much less of an issue, but here we are.
Than surely you can point us to questionable parts in the Knots repository?