I have lost some Bitcoin testing nostr and Lightning over the years

I thought it was worth it, because custodians were supposed to be a temporary solution

Now I hear "Bitcoin banks" are the future

Fuck that

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We are told L2 is cheap, but it seems more expensive than L1.

why don’t you just connect a wallet?

I was told custodial Lightning is temporary. Now I am told the future of Bitcoin is distributed ecash custodians

That’s because self-custodial Lightning is temporary. The LN has way too many issues, and it’s a waste of time and effort

It was a neat idea, but it’s time to move on. Sunk cost fallacy.

when temporary?

did you try it?

Self-custodial Lightning is temporary because there is not enough space on L1. Even the LN whitepaper says Bitcoin needs 133MB blocks for everyone to make just two channels a year.

I don’t need to try it. I know it will work "now", but it’s temporary.

It's like saying the whole world needs to drink from one fountain. There are different fountains.

But I would be quite happy when we reach the mentioned block space problem in the next 3 years.