Not all vaccines were mRNA vaccines therefore not all of the 5m mentioned received an mRNA shot
Discussion
The ones that officially didn't count as mrna in the sense of pf and mod, were still rna jabs affecting DNA and all cells of the body. Both mrna and vector end up telling the cells of our bodies to create the spike proteins. Both versions were contaminated with DNA in various degrees including cancer causing SV40.
The disastrous end results were the same.
Even with Valneva and Novavax, the spike proteins end delivered to the cells, these jabs just don't tell the body to create them. Still, the inflammatory response from a huge number of spike proteins indiscriminately delivered all over the bodies cells, causes the same or at least very similar problems.
Valneva and Novavax made up only a small number of all jabs given, and they came out pretty late. By that time a lot of people refused to take jabs in the same numbers as in the beginning. The range of injuries was and is the same with all of the jabs.
Iām curious:
If it was the specific spike protein target which happened to be toxic that caused these problems and not the mRNA type of vaccine itself, then future mRNA vaccines will be safe when the bird flu comes?
If it was the spike protein, how do you differentiate the problems caused by a synthetically generated spike protein and the one on the actual virus in terms of toxicity. One is a measured dose probably larger than an initial infection of Covid, maybe? but , the other is on a virus which replicates exponentially in the body and the initial dose is variable.
Iām not arguing if the vaccines were safe or not, simply on the science of how they work so Biologists please correct me if Iām wrong.
RNA doesnāt change your DNA its function is to tell the cell organelles what to do.
The m stands for messenger.
In the mRNA āvaccinesā the mRNA gives all cell organelles the same set if instructions.
This bypasses the need to have the immune system meet the virus and create its own anti bodies (which is how a ātraditionalā vaccine or actually catching the ādiseaseā works). With mRNA you jump straight to the āvaccineā telling your body āmake thisā.
What I am trying to say is that the mechanism by which an immune response is created is fundamentally different in an mRNA vaccine compared to a traditional style vaccine and so itās factually inaccurate to say that everyone who received a vaccine was injected with mRNA unless the vaccine companies who produced ātraditionalā vaccines lied about what was in them and no-one bothered to check.