The ones that officially didn't count as mrna in the sense of pf and mod, were still rna jabs affecting DNA and all cells of the body. Both mrna and vector end up telling the cells of our bodies to create the spike proteins. Both versions were contaminated with DNA in various degrees including cancer causing SV40.
The disastrous end results were the same.
Even with Valneva and Novavax, the spike proteins end delivered to the cells, these jabs just don't tell the body to create them. Still, the inflammatory response from a huge number of spike proteins indiscriminately delivered all over the bodies cells, causes the same or at least very similar problems.
Valneva and Novavax made up only a small number of all jabs given, and they came out pretty late. By that time a lot of people refused to take jabs in the same numbers as in the beginning. The range of injuries was and is the same with all of the jabs.
I’m curious:
If it was the specific spike protein target which happened to be toxic that caused these problems and not the mRNA type of vaccine itself, then future mRNA vaccines will be safe when the bird flu comes?
If it was the spike protein, how do you differentiate the problems caused by a synthetically generated spike protein and the one on the actual virus in terms of toxicity. One is a measured dose probably larger than an initial infection of Covid, maybe? but , the other is on a virus which replicates exponentially in the body and the initial dose is variable.
Thread collapsed