Replying to Avatar Robot Lightning

Well my proposition is that survival of the fittest is a way to prove objective moral value. The axiom is that the survivor is the fittest.
Avatar
Chrys 1y ago

Having a Value Axiom proves that the conclusion is NOT an "objective moral value"

Its an evaluation based on the arbitrary axiomatic framework.

Mental frameworks always precede observables.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
sommerfeld 1y ago

I don't think you can make any logical argument without an axiom. Nothing exists in a vacuum.

Avatar
Chrys 1y ago

I'm not saying Axioms by themselves are illogical. Moral axioms cannot be derived from observables, thats all.

They're "good" or "bad" because of some arbitrary Moral claim, within a relativistic worldview.