Then you can look further into it and see that they have all been because of things external to Monero (trading on exchanges, giving personal info, swapping in/out of other transparent crypto like bitcoin, etc)
Next MAHDOOD will start talking about ring signatures, but leave out that this only ever applied to senders (amounts and receivers are encrypted so are impossible to see and remain unaffected) and has never been deterministic only an increase in probability of finding the true spender.
Then he will go back to using a blockchain that 100% deterministically tells you senders by default, and doesn't hide amounts or receivers and not see the irony.

