Replying to Avatar Saberhagen The Nameless

Then you can look further into it and see that they have all been because of things external to Monero (trading on exchanges, giving personal info, swapping in/out of other transparent crypto like bitcoin, etc)

Next MAHDOOD will start talking about ring signatures, but leave out that this only ever applied to senders (amounts and receivers are encrypted so are impossible to see and remain unaffected) and has never been deterministic only an increase in probability of finding the true spender.

Then he will go back to using a blockchain that 100% deterministically tells you senders by default, and doesn't hide amounts or receivers and not see the irony.
Avatar
MAHDOOD 1y ago

These are all from the monero website. It is not anonymous because the anonymity set is too small like I said before. There is no blocksize limit which means that it can’t be decentralized if it ever received massive adoption. And it has no fixed supply which means you can HFSP.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Saberhagen The Nameless 1y ago

Do you know the difference between anonymity and privacy? You brought up privacy earlier not anonymity.

Monero anonymity set is small compared to what? 99% of Bitcoin users don't coinjoin, let alone every transaction, so where is your anon set? Bitcoin isn't even technically anonymous it's psuedonymous. While every single transaction on Monero increases your anon set. With stealth address any transaction sent could've been received by any Monero user ever. How is that for anon set?

I find it funny. You're desperately grasping while ignoring the transparent Bitcoin elephant in the room. It's like a naked person yelling at someone that is fully clothed to put on some gloves and have some decency.

The supply stuff is irrelevant to anything I said. Funny enough the Monero blockchain is still a small fraction of Bitcoins and also has less yearly inflation than Bitcoin.