Replying to nobody

OK, I get it. But, last thing. There are not "enough" of those 'fuckem' people on the contrary. Instead there are too much grifters and parasites of fiat predators. If you are talking about it in a inner circle of Bitcoin community, then you could be right (partialy). But we are now talking about global adoption. So, no. There should be more and more 'fuck em' Bitcoiners.
Avatar
Jeff Swann 2y ago

I think you misunderstood. Let's be extremely generous & assume 10% of the population is Bitcoin friendly no matter what. There are still not enough hardcore Bitcoiners for us to say "fuck everyone who doesn't get it" without there being a serious chance of 90% of the population turning on us completely. CBDCs allow authoritarians to potentially turn everyone against us with financial rewards & punishments. But if only 10% wind up trapped by CBDCs because 80% started using tether tokens on LN to make micropayments & to connect their siloed services (venmo to cash app, etc) then that's a better future for us & the door to bitcoin adoption remains open for most of the normie 90%.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
kyle 2y ago

doesn't jurisdictional arbitrage play a part at that point. don't we just move somewhere bitcoin friendly and start a commune like in atlas shrugged?

Avatar
Jeff Swann 2y ago

Sure... But wouldn't it be dramatically better to avoid having to move & to have their system leaking all over in many different ways rather than just through people who can afford to escape geographically?