Which ones am I relying on?
Discussion
in the post, u use categorization, syntax, semantics, all outgrowths of order itself
the order that subatomic particles follow: no logicially valid argument for how that came to be materialistcally
materialism can only go as far as random chaos, if u are trying to explain any order beyond that, ur reliant upon the immaterial
to even say “the apple is on the table” relies upon the immaterial.
it’s an objective fact
and it doesn’t fit with materialism
Why do we need to answer "how it came to be?" rather than content ourselves with "how it works?"
What does the former question get you?