The state is, first and foremost, an institution whose overarching goal is the forcible subjugation of all the people who inhabit a given territory. However, what makes the state different from other coercive entities, such as organized crime groups, is that it enjoys some form of popular legitimacy. In other words, in addition to enslaving its inhabitants physically, it needs to secure their mental servitude as well.

defeating statism requires recognizing its nature not only as the ideology of permanent conflict but also as the most potent driving force of institutionalized unreality. In other words, accomplishing this task requires realizing that the “great fiction” in its fully developed form is equally fictitious in the realm of solutions that it claims to offer and in the realm of problems that it claims to identify. As soon as this realization becomes sufficiently widespread among liberty-minded people, their efforts will become genuinely robust, meaningfully inclusive, and solidly pragmatic—which is something that we should all welcome given how impactful our action or inaction is likely to be at this late stage of the fight.

https://mises.org/wire/statism-and-unmaking-reality

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Recently, I've been thinking more about the ideas of statism being a cult and statists having Stockholm Syndrome.

We should be taking those insights into account more in our persuasion efforts. You generally can't just reason someone out of a cult or mental illness, as they're robust against that approach.

This is wrong. Saying the state “is evil” is absurd, or should be rephrased. It won’t educate no one.

The State has bad incentives.

The first one is survival. You can’t “make good” if you are not elected. Eventually that trumps everything. Between a good e room that won’t reeLect you and a bad action that will, the latter is always preferred (if you are elected, you can “compensate" the bad action later)

Also, you can be more “efficient doing good” the more control you have. That’s why engineers love centralisation for eficiency, they never go for robustness through decentralisation, redundancy is always preferred.

These 2 incentives turn its actions evil, even if compromised completely of “good” people.

Finally power always attracts psychos who will have an advantage. You can’t beat evil+ambitious+intelligent