Replying to Avatar Jeff Booth

If #bitcoin stays decentralized and secure, it is imposing the first global free market the world has ever seen.

Productivity gains flow to broadly to society in free markets through deflation.

Everyone gets richer every year and competition to provide value increases driving a cycle of unprecedented prosperity.

But, if you are pricing #Bitcoin in USD, you are still in the system of extraction and centralization which must centralize faster through the extraction of the productivity gains that should flow to society in the form of lower prices.

The two systems are incompatible!!

And…It is a confusing topic because we have no reference for what a global free market looks like……so many people will get rug pulled (eventually) by not choosing self custody and running nodes. Instead trusting institutions and a paper derivative of their #bitcoin.

Why: because it will appear they are getting wealthy (in USD) Protecting the decentralization and security by running nodes and being constantly vigilant for new attack vectors will seem like a stretch! For most people pressing the easy button in an ETF or other centralized entity will seem like the right thing to do which ensures faster centralizing.

That centralized system of extraction MUST eventually attack Bitcoin or fail.

This may be a long time out. Ie - if I was on the other side of the fight - I would make my system as easy to integrate to bitcoin as possible and use the natural biases of humans against them. Ease of use, trust in institutions, time, etc so they didn’t “need” to worry about self custody and understanding how the protocol works.

Those on building on #Nostr, Bitcoin, Lightning, Ecash and spending their time contributing on this open protocol and teaching others are on the front edge of the greatest change the world has ever seen. From extraction to cooperation.

Stay vigilant, stay focused, run a node, and tune out the madness of the system of extraction trying to drag you back into its centralized structure.

For the opportunity to exist, It had to be this way!

We are so early.

BTC is 100% trackable and wallets have been earmarked by governments for seizure and complete blockage. It is NOT good enough for free market. Also transactions made very slow and of varying expense. Cannot scale like that. So what the hell are you talking about. It cannot support free financial transactions with safety and at scale.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He did say 'if", guaranteeing that it will not stay decentralized.

I share your sceptical view. Nevertheless it's the best approach so far, as there's global trust in the fairness of BTC. Lightning is not the way to onboard the rest of the world, but I'm sure it's not the end of the game.

No there is not. For a while there was a lot of merchant adoption. Then fees got too high and throughput dropped and less and less merchants supported it. Lightning has helped some but there are still problems. Many parts of global south are more likely to use stablecoins than BTC. Dash has been popular for daily payments for lower fees. Where freedom from transaction surveillance and control is needed many turn to XMR and other privacy coins which also have low and stable fees. As long as BTC has small blocks the throughput problem remains and even adding second layers only goes so far.