There will never be a successful bitcoin fork just as BCH failed. Not because of any principles or people voting with nodes but because the name is not Bitcoin (BTC). People want the thing they know and familiar with.
Discussion
I think I disagree. Bitcoin works because of it's perfectly balanced incentive structures. These forks all fuck with that balance. Their failed designs are why they fail, not their name
Name has way more to do with it than anyone realizes
I hope that's not true. But maybe you're right
Case in point eth classic …
ETH Classic isn't to ETH, what BCH/BSV are to BTC...
In the ETH case both are shit, so it all comes down to marketing. There I agree with you.
With BTC one is actually designed specifically for a purpose (digital commodity money) and the other is shit. One is winning because of its functional properties, not because of marketing.
Bitcoin Cash tried so hard to just be called "Bitcoin" while renaming "Bitcoin" to "Bitcoin Core". It didn't work.
Ya
Btc is perfect. Do not tamper with what is perfect in design
Hmm... perhaps.
I think the best money wins though too. The hardest, most battle tested money wins out.
Also, no one will catch up with hash rate