I think I disagree. Bitcoin works because of it's perfectly balanced incentive structures. These forks all fuck with that balance. Their failed designs are why they fail, not their name
Discussion
Name has way more to do with it than anyone realizes
I hope that's not true. But maybe you're right
Case in point eth classic …
ETH Classic isn't to ETH, what BCH/BSV are to BTC...
In the ETH case both are shit, so it all comes down to marketing. There I agree with you.
With BTC one is actually designed specifically for a purpose (digital commodity money) and the other is shit. One is winning because of its functional properties, not because of marketing.