Housing and parking are both uses of land, so they're part of the same overall market for land usage, so obviously demand for 1 will affect the price of the other.
Think man!
Discussion
wow you are so smart !
now explain to me why cities with the most expensive housing like San Francisco also have the least parking ...
and vice versa.
in fact America has the most affordable housing on earth in terms of square footage versus average income.
it also has the most parking one earth.
riddle me that ...
RETARD.
in science you are supposed to TEST theories.
if you have bothered testing your theory would have found it doesn't match the data.
in effect your theory is that increasing housing density ( by using all available land ) will lower housing costs yet the data is crystal clear that the exact opposite is the case. housing cost always increases with density. never decreases.
listening to your lying ass professor is not a substitute for having a working brain sonny boy.
you can tell me to "think man" when you're top 1% IQ like me.
you need to define your counterfactual
increasing housing density will certainly lower housing costs, compare the the counterfactual of the same place, with the same underlying demand but lower density
with the same underlying demand ?
will you apply the same principles when we discuss highway widening projects ?
will you also assume that demand will not increase ?
what if i told you that it isn't highway widening that is inducing the demand that is causing traffic
what if i told you that it is building new housing that is inducing the demand causing traffic
do you know what the real solution to housing crisis is ?
stopping illegal immigration. we are building enough homes as it is. the problem is we have more illegals coming in than we are building homes.
50 years ago California was 95% white. today just 28% of births in California go to whites, and 48% to Mexicans. when you have that rate of immigration you can build as much as you want and the prices of housing will never go down - you're just going to get more and more traffic consisting of cars circling blocks looking for parking just like it already is in NYC and why i had to leave NYC.
yes, immigration increases demand for land, which increases prices for all uses of land including housing and parking - what i've been saying
but you support immigration ...
why do you say that?
because Urbanism is the project of the World Economic Forum ( 15 minute cities etc. ) and International Finance Jewry that is behind WEF is also behind Mass Immigration.
https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/c/urbanism/urbanism-explained/88
what makes you say i support it though?
because people who are against cars and parking ( Urbanists ) all come out of the same WEF ( World Economic Forum ) pipeline, whether they are willing participants ( paid shill "experts" ) or useful idiots ( college students ).
people in that pipeline are generally also anti-white and pro-immigration.
lately, however, Urbanism has been reaching the pro-white corners of the internet, and i have also written specifically about this tragic development here:
https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/t/urbanists-are-now-on-the-fediverse/918
unfortunately there is no cure for stupidity. not everybody can have top 1% IQ like me.
Cars and Guns are the only things protecting Whites from invading hordes of Sub-Humans.
Either you want White Race to survive or Perish.
If you want it to survive you will be Pro car and Anti Immigration.
If you want White Race to perish you will be anti car and pro immigration.
Is this rocket science to you ? Have you had your IQ measured ?
all the "high IQ" people I have known are jabbed to the max normies. At a population level it correlates with compliance, obedience and stupidity.
Honestly i wouldn't brag about it if i were you
you're thinking 120 IQ not 140 IQ
120 IQ is somebody just smart enough to be a useful idiot. a person with 120 IQ can "believe" and "trust" the science, but can't question it.
140 IQ is when science textbooks look like children's coloring books and you talk down to your professors and everybody else.
And when considering another human I don't care about melanin concentration - it's blood group we should be worrying about..
so, thought experiment:
swap a black and a white baby at birth - so the black baby grows up in a white family etc, and vice versa
what do you think about the black person and white person when they're adults?
that's the same as saying swap brother and sister at birth. raise son as a woman and daughter as a man.
so the actual biology matters, you are saying?
yes. but there is also the added element that we can see each other's race, and all races were taught by Jews to hate white people.
Jews will escape to Israel and everybody else will be slaughtered.
what aspect of black people's biology is important here?
their small brain, their low IQ and their poor impulse control.
i don't want to hear anything from you until you read my article below:
https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/t/why-skin-color-is-correlated-with-intelligence/117
Thanks for the link. I definitely accept your point that temperature / climate has to be a strong determinant of behaviours that can be interpreted as 'intelligence' but also of other things.
To me, the biggest effect is likely to be an urgency to do something. In a warm climate it's better to take it easy, and you don't have to worry about shelter etc. In the cold you are going to have to get the fuck up and do stuff, and who wants to sit around relaxing.
But three issues come to mind. (I put these to you as genuine questions, as you seem to have properly thought about it).
First, is this biological or sociological? You can imagine it being either (or both), and you'd think this could be answered scientifically:
what are the biological correlates of warm or cold climates?
Second, just because you are in a warm climate and don't have the urgency of needing shelter etc, you will still be living at the edge of natural selection - because all living things do (or did until we started controlling our environment as we do now). Intelligence still had to be a major part of how people competed and survived in hot climates. So it's not obvious to me that urgency because of cold is more likely to foster evolution of intelligence than urgency because of, say, need to avoid predators or gather food efficiently. Perhaps its a different kind of intelligence?
Third there are plenty of very hot places with non-black races - what's your view of those people?
doesn't sound like you understood the mechanism by which heat caps intelligence.
tell you what. if you join my site i may answer some of your stupid questions because i like to create the illusion that i actually have users on there. but there is no point for me to tell you anything here as you don't understand anything i say anyway.
i should add that aside form low intelligence another important characteristic of blacks is high testosterone.
both black men and women have higher testosterone than any other race.
high testosterone is what makes blacks aggressive.
and it is the combination of stupidity and aggressiveness that makes them incompatible with any kind of western civilization.
by contrast Japs are the opposite - they have high IQ and low Test. it is likely that low Testosterone is a direct result of high intelligence when it comes to evolution. that is to say high Test is beneficial for hunters but detrimental in any other type of society.
essentially blacks are unfit for sharing a habitat with anything but Hyenas and other African Wild Life.
i will have to write a separate article about negative correlation between intelligence and testosterone on a race level.
there is no such correlation on individual level.
but yes it is true Niggers have Huge Dicks, Balls and High Testosterone.
Chimpanzee testicles are almost the same size as their brain, and Niggers are half-chimps. When you understand those two facts about Niggers you really understand EVERYTHING there is to know about Niggers.
here is a pic of Chimpanzee Testicle size compared to Chimpanzee Brain size
Mm, I was interested in what you said because it seemed that you were thinking objectively about these questions.
But the fact you refer to black people as niggers, and the way you talk about black people makes it seem like its more of an emotional or personal view - is that fair?
they're objectively niggers and if you don't take personal experience of having had to deal with them into consideration and instead chalk it up to "bad apples" you're not going to make it.
granted not all black people are Niggers just like not all women are Hoes and not all Jews are Kikes, but an engineer has to design for the worst case scenario not hope for the best.
having a seatbelt isn't the same as wanting to crash. having a gun isn't the same as wanting to kill people. they are precautionary measures that any intelligent person would use.
likewise no sane man would ever get close to Niggers if he had any way of avoiding it.
the way we avoid niggers is by living in LOW DENSITY SUBURUBS, driving a car, not using public transportation, and staying away from apartment buildings.
also i'm muting you. good bye.
because there is a high demand for housing in SF, shrugs
which means price for parking also high
because there is fundamentally a high demand for land in SF
it's not rocket surgery!
so you're saying that adding more lanes to highway doesn't work due to induced demand ...
but adding more housing to a city is somehow not subject to the same pitfall of induced demand ...
except the evidence is that it indisputably is.
the housing demand is not "fundamental" to the rocks of San Francisco. it is CREATED by city planning.
why is there demand in SF and zero demand on 90% of the surface of USA which is either wilderness or crop land ?
MAYBE YOU SHOULD BE ASKING THESE QUESTIONS.
it's kind of important.
it may not be rocket surgery for me but it clearly is for you !
building more housing accomplishes NOTHING due to INDUCED DEMAND
here, educate yourself: