As a resident of a country that illegally has a NATO base on its territory, Putin's very coherent interview makes it clear once again that NATO and the CIA are the cancer of our world.
We live in a multipolar era. Let's open our minds and hope that peace and understanding between nations will come.
and Julian being freed ...
GN #Nostr 🌌đźŚ
Could you remind me when was the last time NATO fired strategical weapon into residential area?
As I said, friend, I do not support any type of war and I hope that countries understand each other peacefully. But after living a lifetime watching hidden torture at guantanamo and Irak, support for coups d'Ă©tat, sustained violations to human rights and free press, devastated minorities both locally and internationally. Your question is so funny that it didn't deserve to be answered.
Hate is the strategical weapon.
Its great to not support any type of war or even violence. But do you understand that war and violence sometimes are not bidirectional ?
There are cases when people just want to commit violence and go to the war with you irregardless of who you are, what you do and what you want
And in this case you can’t “turn your other cheek” like in bible or smth, you could chose between:
1) die
2) become a slave
3) fight back/hate back/war back
And funny here is only your inability to answer my question which you are hiding behind some philosophical considerations :)
You said that Putins interview was very coherent. Can you please explain me something. In the interview (16:45) putin said that bolsheviks established Soviet Ukraine which was never existed before. Probably he means Ukraine never existed because otherwise his words doesn't make sense. Then he said (17:40) that Lenin give Ukraine territory (Black Sea region) which has no historical connection with Ukraine. So - how can territory can have no HISTORICAL connection with Ukraine which never existed before?
I have struggle to understand this logic.
I do not know the ancient history of Russia and Ukraine to give an opinion on the matter. I'm talking about coherence on the matter in general conflic situation and NATO/CIA after the WWII.
I have no opinion on historical territorial claims beyond those of my own country. Victim of dictatorships sponsored by the CIA in the 70s.
I translate: “I don’t know anything about neither rusia or Ukraine but I don’t like US/CIA/NATO and I know they all don’t like rusia so I stand with rusia”
Thats actually a pretty valid and okish position. But only like 100 years in the past and before. With the amount of available information a person making such claims looks plain stupid, because it could take at max couple of says to educate themselves. But they don’t want to spend their time and they better chose to become genocide supporters instead of admitting they are blessed to just don’t give a fuck yet and stay ignorant
You know, talking general we can't find truth. way better in my opinion is to analyze facts, verify it with different sources then make conclusion.
Just opinions friend, the only truth comes with time and history.
BTW what I said is not about history, it was about general logic. How territory can have or not have historical connection with country if he one minute ago said that country never existed.
I think we are trying to look for tiny details in a very deep discussion. It's beyond me too, it's just my opinions that They accompany my notes because that's how I feel and see it. Nothing serious.
in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1__EPqhMrFQ
putin says - "russia recognized the borders of modern day Ukraine". That is 2008.
So is this coherent with what he said in Tucker interview?
can you give more details - what country you are talking about, which NATO base and why do you think its illegal?
I don't believe it friend, history believes it. Truth and justice always comes. Sometimes it just takes longer. Have a good day.
