France will impose a tax on unrealized gains in #Bitcoin and other “passive wealth”.
Can anyone from France corroborate this?
https://www.senat.fr/amendements/2024-2025/143/Amdt_I-128.html
France will impose a tax on unrealized gains in #Bitcoin and other “passive wealth”.
Can anyone from France corroborate this?
https://www.senat.fr/amendements/2024-2025/143/Amdt_I-128.html
Just self-custody and never sell, just use in bitcoin circular economy.
That will fuck'em'all.
The first law of a Bitcoiner should be to never pay taxes on Bitcoin.
The second law is to never exchange Bitcoin for Fiat money.
nostr:note1vkrtxq9jrga6vy6c2a0jcf3d6shch7c65qe6s2pgtw4qa8umv02qs8hssf
similar news from denmark. I suspect the eu will do everything to get our sats
THATS SOME REVOLUTION TYPE SPEAK, YOU CRAZY FREEDOM LOVERS
And I wrote several guides about how to do that. People just have to read them all.
Now that i actually have my own ln node digging back into your guides. 
Seems that your nostr:nprofile1qydhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yetvv9uju7t9va58ymewvdhk6tcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqzq3jhml5fvklgnq9fxpete767txn9zfzqdkc0sxfptmnchfrexje75nkw0v Hub is not online. Can't find route to zap you.
It shows online and haa given me nothing but problems. Some can zap others cannot and fuck me if i know why
Only 1 channel?
Possible
But what is the point of alby's LSP if so?
I think it might be a nostr:nprofile1qqs0nt9skq6vfsgh06v979rrnuchau87mmnk2lqxpv2xaeusqfp30mqpzamhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcprfmhxue69uhkxct5wd68yu3wwdmkzundwd68ytnrdaksz9nhwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmny9ulaw9v2 issue sort of. If nostr:nprofile1qqsw4wp8ql3zr780z33e7a03ha5rxange5lhnpmuz0gvld427ht2wfqpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9uq37amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwdjkce3dv3jhgetjd45kuety9ejx2tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0wca46m did a single channel LSP style routing into it could be a pain for a regular noderunner because the LSPs suck up all liquidity in every channel very quickly.
I just zapped nostr:nprofile1qqsw4wp8ql3zr780z33e7a03ha5rxange5lhnpmuz0gvld427ht2wfqpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9uq37amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwdjkce3dv3jhgetjd45kuety9ejx2tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0wca46m but I happen to have channels into the LSPs with some liquidity on my side right now.
Only until i decided to self host did i realize that i know FUCK ALL, you can read every guide you want but some things need be put into practice to actually learn...
Yes, I tried again and it worked.
I get that sometimes too with NWC. Even my custodial nostr:nprofile1qqsyv47lazt9h6ycp2fsw270khje5egjgsrdkrupjg27u796g7f5k0spzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6vfwde3x7tnpdenkzmnf9e3k75xqss4 wallet did it. An immediate follow up attempt to zap usually works so I don't think it is a channel balance issue.
yeah, but unrealized gains means that they tax your assets regardless of whether you sell
If any gov agency send me any letter about taxes or other bullshit, I just send it back with this label on it

That's why I do not pay any taxes. They cannot prove me that I signed any contract with them. They tried few times and they failed.
Guys learn how to rebut any authority over you, the living man.
Only slaves and corporations that already signed a contract with the state MUST pay taxes.
Living men DO NOT PAY TAXES.
Read more and learn: https://stacker.news/items/586916
En gran parte de Suiza también se habla francés. Have fun repartiendo miseria.
Objeto
Esta enmienda tiene como objetivo reemplazar el IFI, un impuesto sobre el patrimonio “inmobiliario”, por un impuesto sobre el patrimonio “improductivo”.
De hecho, la base de las IFI, compuesta por activos inmobiliarios no asignados a la actividad profesional de su propietario, parece económicamente incoherente.
Por un lado, las inversiones en “piedra y papel” y en alquiler están incluidas en el ámbito de aplicación de las IFI, aunque son innegablemente inversiones productivas que contribuyen al crecimiento y, al mismo tiempo, satisfacen las necesidades de los hogares y las empresas. Desde este punto de vista, es un error considerar el sector inmobiliario como una inversión improductiva.
Por otra parte, las IFI excluyen de su base los activos que claramente no contribuyen al dinamismo de la economía francesa. De hecho, la decisión de limitar el alcance de la actual IFI a los activos inmobiliarios sólo conduce a eximir elementos de activos como el efectivo y los bienes de consumo, que representaban una parte sustancial de la base del ISF y difícilmente pueden describirse como “productivos”.
Paradójicamente, una estrategia sin duda "antieconómica" consistente en vender un apartamento actualmente alquilado de forma no profesional para dejar el producto de la venta en la cuenta corriente o comprar un yate permite ahora escapar de las IFI.
Con esta modificación, se incluiría en la base de esta IFI renovada lo siguiente:
- edificios no construidos (por ejemplo, terrenos edificables), cuando no se utilizan para una actividad económica;
- efectivo e inversiones financieras similares (cuenta corriente, cuentas de ahorro, fondos monetarios, etc.);
- bienes muebles corporales (objetos preciosos, automóviles, yates, aviones, muebles, etc.);
- activos digitales (por ejemplo, bitcoins);
- los derechos de propiedad literaria, artística e industrial, cuando el responsable no sea el autor ni el inventor. 
I guess when all the politicians pay unrealised gains on all their investments and show proof will be the day to talk 🤡
I wonder if it is even possible under judicial system in any European country. Is there any example of such abomination being implemented? No, Danes did not introduced it (there were some proposals), neither did Italians. Just bear in mind that not only it is against all property right, common logic but also affects the actual ruling class. I know they are abusing the law every day but they try to do that in small steps so than nobody cares. This is to obvious, to big to ignore.
My point is that while being impossible to have this processed through the law system this might be just some kind of distraction, some game those puppets play for their masters.
I am not an expert on French politics but as I understand there is dumpster fire there, no ruling majority, all socialists fighting each other and all together affraid of Le Pen. Macron just plays his possibly last game. France politics is a mess even in European standards. I do not know who is this guy proposing this law. Is it “someone” or just some random nobody.
They're too busy being French to notice
This is typical Socialist nonsense.
Unproductive capital? So the few people that there are who exhihit low time preference and have the patience, wisdom and commitment to save for the future, so that they have capital to be self-sufficient, independent, and to fund future businesses and to help friends and family financially should the need arise, they call those unproductive and want to ROB them?
This is the concept of LEGAL PLUNDER that Bastiat talked about.
And as always, those vile ignorant Socialists demonstrate their envy and their resolute lack of knowledge of Economics.
What they desire is a blob of average, dependent people. This is the true meaning of equity, the only place everyone could perform the same, the lowest common denominator.
Meanwhile there sits the Socialist, robbing everyone blind, and now he doesn't have competition, as he empoverished everyone else.
Vile and disgusting and incredibly dishonest.

Another step towards communism. Coming to a country you live in
This is why you should always purchase non kyc'd
How exposed are you if this is imposed in your part of the woods?