nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqwamvxt2tr50ghu4fdw47ksadnt0p277nv0vfhplmv0n0z3243zyqkmdjma nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq294d6xdgvx30g2wvezpluueyx9ua22vzfryz04504l5z9e5hcq2qw6c3cg nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq0npj3gydmv40m70ehemmal6vsdyfl7tewgvz043g54p0x23y0s8q7r6usq You aren't a privacy or security researcher. You aren't a developer. You aren't technical. You don't have access to classified information unavailable to others as you pretend. Insecure products you promote are in fact not a way to avoid the unsubstantiated backdoors you claim exist everywhere else.
Discussion
Repeating yourself won't make me care whether you consider me a researcher or developer. I am technical.
Where have I pretended to have access to classified information unavailable to others?
What insecure products have I promoted?
Why can't you specify which part of my backdoor claims is unsubstantiated - that they are present, or that the concept of them is incompatible with the concept of end to end encryption? It's difficult to continue addressing your misunderstanding on this point without clarification
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqwamvxt2tr50ghu4fdw47ksadnt0p277nv0vfhplmv0n0z3243zyqkmdjma nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq294d6xdgvx30g2wvezpluueyx9ua22vzfryz04504l5z9e5hcq2qw6c3cg nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq0npj3gydmv40m70ehemmal6vsdyfl7tewgvz043g54p0x23y0s8q7r6usq You might as well be an AI spam bot designed to waste people's time and energy. We'd prefer interacting with an LLM than you and it would probably be a better use of time. We've made it clear we want you to stop contacting us and will be blocking the bridged account if you continue posting nonsense.