Calling it an “attack” implies harm. Putting quotes around “shadowban” implies it wasn’t actually a shadowban. I’m curious how nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr defines an attack? Wouldn’t an attack imply malice? Or indicate harm done? How does the nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg team define “shadowban”? I would think disallowing access to something without explicitly giving reasons is pretty shadowy?
But I’m just a dude on the internet so 🤷♂️ nostr:note13rgfufl5qggvfax3fm82ehjkyyg4aralc6mysu68555fv9j2rrgq7lpl45
I would agree on all and how do you define manipulation for personal gain… exploit? Cuz that’s what happen here.
Hacked it for personal promotion. Definitely built an exploit. Had it caused harm to anyone that would be selfish with harm to others: evil. No?
No replies yet.
