Calling it an “attack” implies harm. Putting quotes around “shadowban” implies it wasn’t actually a shadowban. I’m curious how nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr defines an attack? Wouldn’t an attack imply malice? Or indicate harm done? How does the nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg team define “shadowban”? I would think disallowing access to something without explicitly giving reasons is pretty shadowy?

But I’m just a dude on the internet so 🤷‍♂️ nostr:note13rgfufl5qggvfax3fm82ehjkyyg4aralc6mysu68555fv9j2rrgq7lpl45

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Their favorite quote to us just dudes on the internet is "don't bitch build" I say to well just imagine hahaha

And a famous response I get on here is. What are you doing with your life? Just because I'm not a developer. And you already know what I would say to that all the time. Hahaha

I would agree on all and how do you define manipulation for personal gain… exploit? Cuz that’s what happen here.

Hacked it for personal promotion. Definitely built an exploit. Had it caused harm to anyone that would be selfish with harm to others: evil. No?