It's only the most important role for people who choose to do it. We don't all need to have babies. Humanity is not at any risk of dying out because some people choose not to.
Discussion
I understand that. It's just that most people are happier with family. A life of solitude is not for the masses. This is clearly true for all of human history. I'm a libertarian. I'm not against what any individual decides what they want to do with their life. I do not care, I just wish society at large was in less despair so they should really explore this path first. I just have an opinion of the most likely path to happiness for the majority of people. There are obviously exclusions. There always is.
I'm sure more people do want to have children, but the current state of society makes that seem impossible. So of course people are depressed when they want children, but don't think they can properly care for them. We should (and as Bitcoiners we are) fighting for a more equitable world where those who do want children are able to follow through with that desire.
I agree
I have a problem with you keep saying "most women" and "most people". That's clearly your assumption cuz none of us know "most women" or "most people" in the world.
And again, it's not having babies or being in solitude. How about just a life partner? How about community? How about friends? How about other family members? Why having family only means having babies??
It doesn't but for most of human history it has.