I don’t think you’re in on some grand conspiracy, but the fact you won’t consider (publicly at least) the issues that aren’t filter related is… 🤔
Is it that:
- You don’t want to risk your future Core contributions being rejected for not towing the line?
- You want to keep the argument centered on filters so it’s easy to dismiss Knots as stupid?
- You know something we don’t?
It doesn’t need to be that all Core devs are in on it. There’s enough concern just with Todd, Lopp and Citrea and the way it seems hastily forced through despite objections.
As I said before:
nostr:nevent1qqsvzg2s4kxcfntaj56mteaw0rnlrdqzzf8u05fgfypa5c876d2vfecpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqcqkv25
> You don’t want to risk your future Core contributions being rejected for not towing the line
this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how bitcoin contributions work. there is not some central authority that gatekeeps contributions. luke has controversial takes all the time, so do I and every other core dev.
we all disagree all the time. this is basic engineering. the point is to get rough consensus from subsystem domain experts.
