Nostr Web Client

so your “substantive argument” is that all core devs (including me i guess) is under a grand conspiracy to undermine bitcoin .

And mine is: domain experts actually know what they are doing. Which is an “ad hominem “ somehow

Ok bud 🙄

Leigh 3mo ago 💬 1

I don’t think you’re in on some grand conspiracy, but the fact you won’t consider (publicly at least) the issues that aren’t filter related is… 🤔

Is it that:

- You don’t want to risk your future Core contributions being rejected for not towing the line?

- You want to keep the argument centered on filters so it’s easy to dismiss Knots as stupid?

- You know something we don’t?

It doesn’t need to be that all Core devs are in on it. There’s enough concern just with Todd, Lopp and Citrea and the way it seems hastily forced through despite objections.

As I said before:

nostr:nevent1qqsvzg2s4kxcfntaj56mteaw0rnlrdqzzf8u05fgfypa5c876d2vfecpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqcqkv25

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

jb55 3mo ago 💬 1

> You don’t want to risk your future Core contributions being rejected for not towing the line

this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how bitcoin contributions work. there is not some central authority that gatekeeps contributions. luke has controversial takes all the time, so do I and every other core dev.

we all disagree all the time. this is basic engineering. the point is to get rough consensus from subsystem domain experts.

Leigh 3mo ago 💬 1

Good to know. What about the other parts?

jb55 3mo ago 💬 1

i don't even know how to reply to those because they are vague

Leigh 3mo ago

Ok…