Come back when you can spar beyond your deeply held beliefs that sugar is bad.
Discussion
Haha your ability to critically think is staggeringly poor.
None of these things are arguments.
I asked you a series of questions that you failed to answer with any substance. You said sugar is good because of energy. I proceeded to talk you that something is not inherently good because it has energy. I named shoelaces and sawdust. You then introduced “easy” into the conversation. I asked you for a definition. You provided the conventional definition of easy and not one that pertains to metabolism. Your claims were empty as it were.