Haha your ability to critically think is staggeringly poor.
Discussion
None of these things are arguments.
I asked you a series of questions that you failed to answer with any substance. You said sugar is good because of energy. I proceeded to talk you that something is not inherently good because it has energy. I named shoelaces and sawdust. You then introduced “easy” into the conversation. I asked you for a definition. You provided the conventional definition of easy and not one that pertains to metabolism. Your claims were empty as it were.