I read the article after posting my reply.
They are twisting study findings to meet their narrative that herbs are bad.
I'm sure if I dug deep enough, I would find a pharma sponsorship in here. π
For instance, what they're saying about diabetes is that ashwaghanda works to reduce blood sugar and will interfere with your prescription meds that are also reducing blood sugar.... so instead of high blood sugar, mixing with ashwaghanda means you may have blood sugar levels that are too low!
Now if your working with an Ayurveda doctor, they can help ease you off the diabetes meds (and others), slowly so you don't wack out your blood sugar levels....in some cases, along with dietary changes, the patient can completely stop taking expensive pharmaceuticals and switch to less expansive herbs or nothing at all (food is medicine).
People being cured of disease is disasterous for the medical industrial complex.
So these types of articles need to be printed regularly to scare people away. They usually bring out articles about lead and mercury in herbs from India too.
Sourcing is important.... but do people have any idea of the toxic ingredients that are in pharmaceuticals they currently are popping? π
So yes.... consult with an Ayurveda physician and don't self medicate. β¨π
Reading a study these days without knowing who funded it, and what the parameters for findings were, is not much different than basing your future off of fortune cookies.
Based before based was cool. Timestamp proved
i just donβt remember saying that, and it sounded smart.
plus repost is so much easier than typing.
π« my point stands, it was based before based was cool π€
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
π takes all the fortune cookie fortunes off the fridge...
This is a very good analogy. Follow the $$.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Iβm a big believer in self experimentation. Be your own guinea pig. Find what works for you.
Thread collapsed