No, they don't. Additionally, you've shifted your thesis. Initially, you claimed they have an unfair advantage in inflating the UTXO set, which would be problematic if true. Now, you've changed the topic to block space instead of the UTXO set. Firstly, there's a significant distinction since I store the UTXO set on SSD and the blocks directory on HDD, which is more cost-effective. Secondly, when I send transactions, I receive a discount for SegWit data. They might leverage it more for a greater discount, but it's still fair as it follows the same rule for everyone. I also gain an advantage over someone using legacy addresses and overpaying for each transaction. They deserve it, and so do I. It's fair!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If you think UTXO set space and block space are not interconnected you are retarded, I already figured you were though so thats no surprise.

Strowman. I didn't say they are not interconnected. The price of 1byte in block and 1byte in utxo set is very different for node operators, that's the point. Why did you brought utxo set issue in the first place then?

IT AFFECTS THE UTXO SET TOO YOU IMPOTENT RETARD

It doesn't affect utxo set size.

Oh yea durr these UTXOs are just magically stored in my ass I forgot

Another strowman

Coming from a dude who cant even spell straw-man, the fact that you are so incessantly and feverishly lying to my face to defend your shitcoins just proves im correct. Keep proving me right bozo

literalism

awww little baby got defeated on every argument now has to reach for logical cliches he also could not fully explain even if he tried? you are so cute and the rest of you ordinal supporting shitcoiners are too. cute dumb illogical and losing all your bitcoin to scams.

You are the one who proposed censorship. Justify it or fuck off

LMFAO he said imposing fair cost to overriding datacarriers is censorship, while spamming strawman and not being able to identify it. You Illogical fucks are so ironic it hurts.

What do you mean by cost of overriding datacarrier? Changing the option value has zero cost and zero effect of ability of miners to mine ordinal transactions.

I explained it several times, please leave. You are clearly consciously rejecting all of my explanations.

No you haven't. You jumped from topic to topic between just using ad hominem.

Literally every single point you have made is completely incorrect, can you just fuck off already you fucking bozo

They are correct. And the consensus is not going to change, get it, unpolite troll!

Fuck you bitch I DONT GIVE A SINGLE FUCK about your stupid shitcoiner feelings, dig a ditch and die in it for all I care you uneducated concern troll. Our patch will make your shitcoins die out faster than BSV delisted from every exchange worth a dime.

Show me your patch, troll

go find it yourself you are a waste of my time

You also just proved my point by admitting they leverage SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT PUSHED THROUGH PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AN EXPLOIT to gain a discount at the storage level on archival nodes which are literally vital for running the network properly.

THANK YOU FOR PROVING MY POINT

No one exploit here. Otherwise the whole segwit is an exploit. You get an advantage over a fair legacy wallet user, who pays the whole price. Stop using segwit and taproot addresses, then bark on other people using segwit discount!

Nope normal segwit scripts under 42 bytes dont get the same level of script discount, try to pay attention

Who defines what is normal? People are free to write custom scripts, that is the whole purpose of having script language there.

I literally just defined it, under 42 bytes CURRENTLY it recieves a fair discount. Above 42 bytes and it pays nothing for datacarrier scripts. The patch would make it so all overriding datacarriers pay the same amount. So plain and simple. Your points are completely baseless.

Well, I don't consider you an authority and fuck your definition in mouth. Who are you to tell everyone what transactions to send?

LMAO coming from the guy spamming strawman, reaching for the "muh puritan transaction" argument. This is about fair use of the network, you obvious shitcoin supporter. We are coming for you. Stay scared. Shit yourself why dont you.

😂

stay scared of the patch faggot, aww too impolite for the shitcoin scammer?

Why to be scared? A patch has 0 chances of adoption. Also there are ways to spam even without the discount. Senders have enough VC money to burn, they don't care about the discount. Let them feed the miners.

LMAO you are just proving how scared you are, stay fearful of our patch you faggot

Frankly I don't give a shit about the patch, because it won't affect me. And this is the reason I would oppose it and do what I can to render it useless (unless it is not already).