The real problem is the flip side of that — new users don’t know whom to follow.

IMO recommender algo is essential for large scale adoption, because it lowers the barrier to entry.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A recommender service that curates stuff on behalf of users and suggests that is a pretty good idea.

The throwaway term "algo" is not really a good one because it means different things from different people and often it means a centralized thing built into the protocol.

Whatever you call it, a recommender system like this naturally drives centralization. It doesn’t need to be (and shouldn’t) on the protocol level, though.

Is it worth the cost?

I don’t see how critical mass can be built without it

Do we really need to follow a lot of people?