He was wrong for not cracking down then. But now nostr:nprofile1qqspwpet0tyefmjyrlrglhyh7wup6hwl9f4c93gy6djyyhd4n3waqcqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qprempt is accusing him of being part of the conspiracy FOR cracking down? So if he doesn’t do something about the black violence, he’s part of the conspiracy? But if he DOES, he’s part of the conspiracy for that as well?

Or perhaps we can apply logical consistency here:

He was WRONG then and RIGHT now because cracking down on the violent anti-white mob is the right thing to do in both circumstances.